Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.5009/gnl13263 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.5009/gnl13263 C4477990!4477990!25473069     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Gut+Liver 2015 ; 9 (4): 470-7 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=25473069|t=2015. Endoscopic and Oncologic Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Esophageal Neoplasm |pdf=|usr=}}{{25473069}} gab.com Text Endoscopic and Oncologic Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Esophageal Neoplasm JO: Gut Liver http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25473069 #FOAvip Background/Aims: Endoscopic resection (ER) of superficial esophageal neoplasm (SEN) is a technically difficult procedure. We investigated the clinical outcomes of ER for SEN to determine its feasibility and effectiveness. Methods: Subjects who underwent ER for SEN at Asan Medical Center between December 1996 and December 2010 were eligible. The clinical features of patients and tumors, histopathological characteristics, adverse events, ER results and survival were investigated. Results: A total of 129 patients underwent ER for 147 SENs. En bloc resection (EnR) was performed in 118 lesions (80.3%). Complete resection (CR) was accomplished in 128 lesions (86.5%), and curative resection (CuR) was performed in 118 lesions (79.7%). The EnR, CR, and CuR rates were significantly greater in the endoscopic submucosal dissection group when compared to those in the endoscopic resection group. Adverse events occurred in 22 patients (17.1%), including bleeding (n=2, 1.6%), perforation (n=12, 9.3%), and stricture (n=8, 6.2%). Local tumor recurrence occurred in 2.0% of patients during a median follow-up of 34.8 months. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 94.0% and 97.5%, respectively. Conclusions: ER is a feasible and effective method for the treatment of SEN as indicated by favorable clinical outcomes. Twit Text FOAVip Endoscopic and Oncologic Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Esophageal Neoplasm ????Gut Liver http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25473069 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25473069 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|25473069}}</ref> Endoscopic and Oncologic Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Esophageal Neoplasm #MMPMID25473069 Kim DH; Jung HY; Gong EJ; Choi JY; Ahn JY; Kim MY; Choi KS; Lee JH; Choi KD; Song HJ; Lee GH; Kim JH; Park YS; Baek S Gut Liver 2015[Jul]; 9 (4): 470-7 PMID25473069show ga Background/Aims: Endoscopic resection (ER) of superficial esophageal neoplasm (SEN) is a technically difficult procedure. We investigated the clinical outcomes of ER for SEN to determine its feasibility and effectiveness. Methods: Subjects who underwent ER for SEN at Asan Medical Center between December 1996 and December 2010 were eligible. The clinical features of patients and tumors, histopathological characteristics, adverse events, ER results and survival were investigated. Results: A total of 129 patients underwent ER for 147 SENs. En bloc resection (EnR) was performed in 118 lesions (80.3%). Complete resection (CR) was accomplished in 128 lesions (86.5%), and curative resection (CuR) was performed in 118 lesions (79.7%). The EnR, CR, and CuR rates were significantly greater in the endoscopic submucosal dissection group when compared to those in the endoscopic resection group. Adverse events occurred in 22 patients (17.1%), including bleeding (n=2, 1.6%), perforation (n=12, 9.3%), and stricture (n=8, 6.2%). Local tumor recurrence occurred in 2.0% of patients during a median follow-up of 34.8 months. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 94.0% and 97.5%, respectively. Conclusions: ER is a feasible and effective method for the treatment of SEN as indicated by favorable clinical outcomes. äEndoscopic and Oncologic Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection for Superfic(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing