Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1073/pnas.1424329112 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1073/pnas.1424329112 C4475978!4475978!26015563     free     free     free       Proc+Natl+Acad+Sci+U+S+A 2015 ; 112 (24): 7426-31 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26015563|t=2015. Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science |pdf=|usr=}}{{26015563}} gab.com Text Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science JO: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26015563 #FOAvip Scientific papers typically have a finite lifetime: their rate to attract citations achieves its maximum a few years after publication, and then steadily declines. Previous studies pointed out the existence of a few blatant exceptions: papers whose relevance has not been recognized for decades, but then suddenly become highly influential and cited. The Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen ?paradox? paper is an exemplar Sleeping Beauty. We study how common Sleeping Beauties are in science. We introduce a quantity that captures both the recognition intensity and the duration of the ?sleeping? period, and show that Sleeping Beauties are far from exceptional. The distribution of such quantity is continuous and has power-law behavior, suggesting a common mechanism behind delayed but intense recognition at all scales. Twit Text FOAVip Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science ????Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26015563 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26015563 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26015563}}</ref> Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science #MMPMID26015563 Ke Q; Ferrara E; Radicchi F; Flammini A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015[Jun]; 112 (24): 7426-31 PMID26015563show ga Scientific papers typically have a finite lifetime: their rate to attract citations achieves its maximum a few years after publication, and then steadily declines. Previous studies pointed out the existence of a few blatant exceptions: papers whose relevance has not been recognized for decades, but then suddenly become highly influential and cited. The Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen ?paradox? paper is an exemplar Sleeping Beauty. We study how common Sleeping Beauties are in science. We introduce a quantity that captures both the recognition intensity and the duration of the ?sleeping? period, and show that Sleeping Beauties are far from exceptional. The distribution of such quantity is continuous and has power-law behavior, suggesting a common mechanism behind delayed but intense recognition at all scales. äDefining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing