Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1515/dx-2014-0047 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1515/dx-2014-0047 C4474234!4474234!26097801     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Diagnosis+(Berl) 2015 ; 2 (1): 3-19 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26097801|t=2015. Clinical criteria to screen for inpatient diagnostic errors: a scoping review |pdf=|usr=}}{{26097801}} gab.com Text Clinical criteria to screen for inpatient diagnostic errors: a scoping review JO: Diagnosis (Berl) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26097801 #FOAvip Diagnostic errors are common and costly, but difficult to detect. ?Trigger? tools have promise to facilitate detection, but have not been applied specifically for inpatient diagnostic error. We performed a scoping review to collate all individual ?trigger? criteria that have been developed or validated that may indicate that an inpatient diagnostic error has occurred. We searched three databases and screened 8568 titles and abstracts to ultimately include 33 articles. We also developed a conceptual framework of diagnostic error outcomes using real clinical scenarios, and used it to categorize the extracted criteria. Of the multiple criteria we found related to inpatient diagnostic error and amenable to automated detection, the most common were death, transfer to a higher level of care, arrest or ?code?, and prolonged length of hospital stay. Several others, such as abrupt stoppage of multiple medications or change in procedure, may also be useful. Validation for general adverse event detection was done in 15 studies, but only one performed validation for diagnostic error specifically. Automated detection was used in only two studies. These criteria may be useful for developing diagnostic error detection tools. Twit Text FOAVip Clinical criteria to screen for inpatient diagnostic errors: a scoping review ????Diagnosis (Berl) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26097801 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26097801 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26097801}}</ref> Clinical criteria to screen for inpatient diagnostic errors: a scoping review #MMPMID26097801 Shenvi EC; El-Kareh R Diagnosis (Berl) 2015[Feb]; 2 (1): 3-19 PMID26097801show ga Diagnostic errors are common and costly, but difficult to detect. ?Trigger? tools have promise to facilitate detection, but have not been applied specifically for inpatient diagnostic error. We performed a scoping review to collate all individual ?trigger? criteria that have been developed or validated that may indicate that an inpatient diagnostic error has occurred. We searched three databases and screened 8568 titles and abstracts to ultimately include 33 articles. We also developed a conceptual framework of diagnostic error outcomes using real clinical scenarios, and used it to categorize the extracted criteria. Of the multiple criteria we found related to inpatient diagnostic error and amenable to automated detection, the most common were death, transfer to a higher level of care, arrest or ?code?, and prolonged length of hospital stay. Several others, such as abrupt stoppage of multiple medications or change in procedure, may also be useful. Validation for general adverse event detection was done in 15 studies, but only one performed validation for diagnostic error specifically. Automated detection was used in only two studies. These criteria may be useful for developing diagnostic error detection tools. äClinical criteria to screen for inpatient diagnostic errors: a scoping(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing