Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1055/s-0035-1552986 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1055/s-0035-1552986 C4472301!4472301!26131385     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Global+Spine+J 2015 ; 5 (3): 185-94 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26131385|t=2015. Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumentation in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review |pdf=|usr=}}{{26131385}} gab.com Text Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumentation in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review JO: Global Spine J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26131385 #FOAvip Study Design?Systematic review.Clinical Questions?(1) What is the comparative efficacy of unilateral instrumentation compared with bilateral instrumentation in spine surgery? (2) What is the safety of unilateral instrumentation compared with bilateral instrumentation in spine surgery?Methods?Electronic databases and reference lists of key articles were searched up to September 30, 2014, to identify studies reporting the comparative efficacy and safety of unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in spine surgery. Studies including recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 as adjunct therapy and those with follow-up of less than 2 years were excluded.Results?Ten randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria: five compared unilateral with bilateral instrumentation using open transforaminal or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF/PLIF), one used open posterolateral fusion, and four used minimally invasive TLIF/PLIF. There were no significant differences between unilateral and bilateral screw instrumentation with respect to nonunion, low back or leg pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index, reoperation, or complications.Conclusions?The existing literature does not identify significant differences in clinical outcomes, union rates, and complications when unilateral instrumentation is used for degenerative pathologic conditions in the lumbar spine. The majority of published reports involve single-level lumbar unilateral instrumentation. Twit Text FOAVip Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumentation in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review ????Global Spine J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26131385 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26131385 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26131385}}</ref> Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumentation in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review #MMPMID26131385 Molinari RW; Saleh A; Molinari R; Hermsmeyer J; Dettori JR Global Spine J 2015[Jun]; 5 (3): 185-94 PMID26131385show ga Study Design?Systematic review.Clinical Questions?(1) What is the comparative efficacy of unilateral instrumentation compared with bilateral instrumentation in spine surgery? (2) What is the safety of unilateral instrumentation compared with bilateral instrumentation in spine surgery?Methods?Electronic databases and reference lists of key articles were searched up to September 30, 2014, to identify studies reporting the comparative efficacy and safety of unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in spine surgery. Studies including recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 as adjunct therapy and those with follow-up of less than 2 years were excluded.Results?Ten randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria: five compared unilateral with bilateral instrumentation using open transforaminal or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF/PLIF), one used open posterolateral fusion, and four used minimally invasive TLIF/PLIF. There were no significant differences between unilateral and bilateral screw instrumentation with respect to nonunion, low back or leg pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index, reoperation, or complications.Conclusions?The existing literature does not identify significant differences in clinical outcomes, union rates, and complications when unilateral instrumentation is used for degenerative pathologic conditions in the lumbar spine. The majority of published reports involve single-level lumbar unilateral instrumentation. äUnilateral versus Bilateral Instrumentation in Spinal Surgery: A Syste(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing