Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.5152/dir.2014.14372 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.5152/dir.2014.14372 C4463259!4463259!25858525     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Diagn+Interv+Radiol 2015 ; 21 (3): 215-21 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=25858525|t=2015. MRI-guided core needle biopsy of the prostate: acceptance and side effects |pdf=|usr=}}{{25858525}} gab.com Text MRI-guided core needle biopsy of the prostate: acceptance and side effects JO: Diagn Interv Radiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25858525 #FOAvip PURPOSE: We aimed to study side effects, complications, and patient acceptance of magnetic resonance imaging-guided real-time biopsy (MRI-GB) of the prostate. METHODS: Fifty-four men (49?78 years) with elevated prostate-specific antigen after at least one negative systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-GB) were included in a prospective clinical study. Suspicious areas on images were selectively sampled by obtaining a median of four specimens (range, 1?9 specimens) using MRI-GB. In TRUS-GB, a median of 10 specimens (range, 6?14 specimens) were obtained. Telephone interviews were conducted one week after outpatient MRI-GB, asking patients about pain and side effects (hematuria, hemospermia, rectal bleeding, fever, and chills) of the two biopsy procedures and which of the two procedures they preferred. Multinomial regression analysis and Fisher?s exact test was used to test for differences. RESULTS: MRI-GB was preferred by 65% (35/54), and 82% (44/54) would undergo MRI-GB again. Pain intensity (P = 0.005) and bleeding duration (P = 0.004) were significantly lower for MRI-GB compared with TRUS-GB. Hematuria was less common after MRI-GB compared with TRUS-GB (P = 0.006). A high correlation was given between bleeding intensity and bleeding duration for TRUS-GB (r=0.77) and pain intensity and pain duration for MRI-GB (r=0.65). Although hemospermia, rectal hemorrhage, fever, and chills were less common in MRI, they showed no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: MRI-GB of the prostate seems to have fewer side effects and less pain intensity than TRUS-GB and was preferred by the majority of patients. Twit Text FOAVip MRI-guided core needle biopsy of the prostate: acceptance and side effects ????Diagn Interv Radiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25858525 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25858525 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|25858525}}</ref> MRI-guided core needle biopsy of the prostate: acceptance and side effects #MMPMID25858525 Egbers N; Schwenke C; Maxeiner A; Teichgräber U; Franiel T Diagn Interv Radiol 2015[May]; 21 (3): 215-21 PMID25858525show ga PURPOSE: We aimed to study side effects, complications, and patient acceptance of magnetic resonance imaging-guided real-time biopsy (MRI-GB) of the prostate. METHODS: Fifty-four men (49?78 years) with elevated prostate-specific antigen after at least one negative systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-GB) were included in a prospective clinical study. Suspicious areas on images were selectively sampled by obtaining a median of four specimens (range, 1?9 specimens) using MRI-GB. In TRUS-GB, a median of 10 specimens (range, 6?14 specimens) were obtained. Telephone interviews were conducted one week after outpatient MRI-GB, asking patients about pain and side effects (hematuria, hemospermia, rectal bleeding, fever, and chills) of the two biopsy procedures and which of the two procedures they preferred. Multinomial regression analysis and Fisher?s exact test was used to test for differences. RESULTS: MRI-GB was preferred by 65% (35/54), and 82% (44/54) would undergo MRI-GB again. Pain intensity (P = 0.005) and bleeding duration (P = 0.004) were significantly lower for MRI-GB compared with TRUS-GB. Hematuria was less common after MRI-GB compared with TRUS-GB (P = 0.006). A high correlation was given between bleeding intensity and bleeding duration for TRUS-GB (r=0.77) and pain intensity and pain duration for MRI-GB (r=0.65). Although hemospermia, rectal hemorrhage, fever, and chills were less common in MRI, they showed no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: MRI-GB of the prostate seems to have fewer side effects and less pain intensity than TRUS-GB and was preferred by the majority of patients. äMRI-guided core needle biopsy of the prostate: acceptance and side eff(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing