Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3389/fgene.2015.00198 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3389/fgene.2015.00198 C4456611!4456611!26097488     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Front+Genet 2015 ; 6 (ä): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26097488|t=2015. Redrawing the frontiers in the age of post-publication review |pdf=|usr=}}{{26097488}} gab.com Text Redrawing the frontiers in the age of post-publication review JO: Front Genet http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26097488 #FOAvip Publication forms the core structure supporting the development and transmission of scientific knowledge. For this reason, it is essential that the highest standards of quality control be maintained, in particular to ensure that the information being transmitted allows reproducible replication of the described experiments, and that the interpretation of the results is sound. Quality control has traditionally involved editorial decisions based on anonymous pre-publication peer review. Post-publication review of individual articles took the lesser role since it did not feed directly back to the original literature. Rapid advances in computer and communications technologies over the last thirty years have revolutionized scientific publication, and the role and scope of post-publication review has greatly expanded. This perspective examines the ways in which pre- and post-publication peer review influence the scientific literature, and in particular how they might best be redrawn to deal with the twin problems of scientific non-reproducibility and fraud increasingly encountered at the frontiers of science. Twit Text FOAVip Redrawing the frontiers in the age of post-publication review ????Front Genet http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26097488 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26097488 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26097488}}</ref> Redrawing the frontiers in the age of post-publication review #MMPMID26097488 Galbraith DW Front Genet 2015[]; 6 (ä): ä PMID26097488show ga Publication forms the core structure supporting the development and transmission of scientific knowledge. For this reason, it is essential that the highest standards of quality control be maintained, in particular to ensure that the information being transmitted allows reproducible replication of the described experiments, and that the interpretation of the results is sound. Quality control has traditionally involved editorial decisions based on anonymous pre-publication peer review. Post-publication review of individual articles took the lesser role since it did not feed directly back to the original literature. Rapid advances in computer and communications technologies over the last thirty years have revolutionized scientific publication, and the role and scope of post-publication review has greatly expanded. This perspective examines the ways in which pre- and post-publication peer review influence the scientific literature, and in particular how they might best be redrawn to deal with the twin problems of scientific non-reproducibility and fraud increasingly encountered at the frontiers of science. äRedrawing the frontiers in the age of post-publication review (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing