Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3390/jcm3030741 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3390/jcm3030741 C4449654!4449654!26237475     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Clin+Med 2014 ; 3 (3): 741-6 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26237475|t=2014. Pregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling?Time for a Reassessment of Risk |pdf=|usr=}}{{26237475}} gab.com Text Pregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling Time for a Reassessment of Risk JO: J Clin Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26237475 #FOAvip Risk of procedure-related pregnancy loss is currently widely quoted in the UK as 1% for amniocentesis and 1.5% for chorionic villus sampling. Published data suggest that these risk figures are out of date and inaccurate, and that new guidelines are required for pre-test counseling. It is our opinion that accurate and evidence-based information concerning miscarriage risk is vital when counseling women, as exaggeration of this risk may deter women from testing, or cause unjustified remorse if a miscarriage ensues. It is also essential that health-care economists are aware of the up-to-date evidence on ?procedure-related risk? when applying risk-benefit analysis to assess new technology for non-invasive screening. Twit Text FOAVip Pregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling Time for a Reassessment of Risk ????J Clin Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26237475 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26237475 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26237475}}</ref> Pregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling?Time for a Reassessment of Risk #MMPMID26237475 Ogilvie C; Akolekar R J Clin Med 2014[Sep]; 3 (3): 741-6 PMID26237475show ga Risk of procedure-related pregnancy loss is currently widely quoted in the UK as 1% for amniocentesis and 1.5% for chorionic villus sampling. Published data suggest that these risk figures are out of date and inaccurate, and that new guidelines are required for pre-test counseling. It is our opinion that accurate and evidence-based information concerning miscarriage risk is vital when counseling women, as exaggeration of this risk may deter women from testing, or cause unjustified remorse if a miscarriage ensues. It is also essential that health-care economists are aware of the up-to-date evidence on ?procedure-related risk? when applying risk-benefit analysis to assess new technology for non-invasive screening. äPregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling?Time for a Reas(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing