Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 J+Clin+Diagn+Res 2015 ; 9 (4): TC14-8 Nephropedia Template TP
gab.com Text
Twit Text FOAVip
Twit Text #
English Wikipedia
Role of CT Colonography in Colonic Lesions and Its Correlation with Conventional Colonoscopic Findings #MMPMID26023619
J Clin Diagn Res 2015[Apr]; 9 (4): TC14-8 PMID26023619show ga
Background: Preoperative evaluation in patients with colorectal carcinoma is essential for a correct therapeutic plan. Conventional colonoscopy has certain limitations including its inability to detect synchronous lesions in case of distal obstructive mass and inaccurate tumour localization. CT colonography combines cross sectional imaging with virtual colonoscopic images and offers a comprehensive preoperative evaluation in patients with colorectal carcinoma including detection of synchronous lesions with accurate segmental localization and loco regional staging. Aim: The objective was to determine the role of CT colonography in various colonic lesions and to correlate the findings with conventional colonoscopy and histopathological findings. Settings and Design: This prospective study included 50 patients with clinical symptoms suspicious of colonic pathology. Materials and Methods: All the patients underwent both CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy on the same day. CT colonography was performed in supine and prone position. Considering histopathological and/or surgical findings as gold standard, sensitivity and specificity of both the modalities were calculated. Results: Conventional colonoscopy missed two synchronous lesions proximal to occlusive mass and one lesion proximal to the anastomotic site; all were detected with CT colonography. One carpet lesion in rectum and one case of mild ulcerative colitis were missed by CT colonography. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of colorectal cancer were 97.56% and 100%, resp. with PPV and NPV of 100% and 93.75%, for CT colonography and 92.68% and 100%, respectively with PPV and NPV of 100% and 83.3% for conventional colonoscopy. Sensitivity for correct detection of acute and chronic ulcerative colitis of CT colonography was 66.6 % and 100 %, resp. Conclusion: CT colonography has higher sensitivity than conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal carcinoma, including its ability to detect abnormalities proximal to obstructing lesion, accurate segmental localization of lesions and staging. However, some limitations of CT colonography were difficulty in detection of flat lesions and lack of information about hyperemia and superficial mucosal erosion, where conventional colonoscopy scored over CT colonography.
free
free
free
J+Clin+Diagn+Res 2015 ; 9 (4): TC14-8
