Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.7860/JCDR/2015/12720.5854

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.7860/JCDR/2015/12720.5854
suck pdf from google scholar
C4437105!4437105!26046021
unlimited free pdf from europmc26046021    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid26046021      J+Clin+Diagn+Res 2015 ; 9 (4): PC05-9
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • POSSUM: A Scoring System for Perforative Peritonitis #MMPMID26046021
  • Chatterjee AS; Renganathan D
  • J Clin Diagn Res 2015[Apr]; 9 (4): PC05-9 PMID26046021show ga
  • Background and Objectives: Perforative peritonitis carries considerable morbidity and mortality with the postoperative period unpredictable most of the times. It therefore becomes necessary for a scoring system that predicts the post-operative outcome. POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity) helps in predicting the post-operative morbidity and mortality in these patients. POSSUM scores are based on 12 physiological factors and 6 operative factors. In our study, we included two more factors, which are specifically important in perforative peritonitis; they are, perforation to operation time and the presence of co-morbidity. The presence of these factors significantly affects the post-operative status. Through this prospective study, we can predict which patients are at a higher risk of death or complication and give appropriate management as necessary. Materials and Methods: Our sample size was 50 patients with perforative peritonitis. The study was conducted in single unit from September 2013 to August 2014. Data was collected based on POSSUM scoring system. Outcome of the patients was recorded as death / alive; complicated / uncomplicated and statistical analysis was done by comparing the expected and observed outcomes. Results: By applying linear analysis, an observed to expected ratio of 1.005 was obtained for mortality and 1.001 for morbidity. There was no statistically significant difference between the observed and expected mortality rates (?2 = 3.54, p = 0.316) and morbidity rates (?2 = 2.40, p = 0.792). It was found to be comparable with other studies. The factors independently studied; perforation to operation time and presence of co-morbidity were statistically significant with respect to outcome (p<0.05). Conclusion: Although a small sample size is the limitation of this study, POSSUM scoring system is a good indicator of postoperative outcome in patients with perforative peritonitis and was applicable in our setup. It is useful in identifying high risk patients and give preferential care to them for better outcome. Inclusion of factors like perforation to operation time and co-morbid status can improve the scoring system and better care can be provided.
  • ä


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box