Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.acra.2015.01.015 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.acra.2015.01.015 C4429002!4429002!25794800     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Acad+Radiol 2015 ; 22 (6): 779-86 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=25794800|t=2015. Pitfalls in RECIST Data Extraction for Clinical Trials: Beyond the Basics |pdf=|usr=}}{{25794800}} gab.com Text Pitfalls in RECIST Data Extraction for Clinical Trials: Beyond the Basics JO: Acad Radiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25794800 #FOAvip Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is a standardized methodology for determining therapeutic response to anticancer therapy using changes in lesion appearance on imaging studies. Many radiologists are now using RECIST in their routine clinical workflow, as part of consultative arrangements, or within dedicated imaging core laboratories. Although basic RECIST methodology is well described in published articles and online resources, inexperienced readers may encounter difficulties with certain nuances and subtleties of RECIST. This article illustrates a set of pitfalls in RECIST assessment considered to be ?beyond the basics.? These pitfalls were uncovered during a quality improvement review of a recently established cancer imaging core laboratory staffed by radiologists with limited prior RECIST experience. Pitfalls are presented in four categories: (1) baseline selection of lesions, (2) reassessment of target lesions, (3) reassessment of nontarget lesions, and (4) identification of new lesions. Educational and operational strategies for addressing these pitfalls are suggested. Attention to these pitfalls and strategies may improve the overall quality of RECIST assessments performed by radiologists. Twit Text FOAVip Pitfalls in RECIST Data Extraction for Clinical Trials: Beyond the Basics ????Acad Radiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25794800 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25794800 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|25794800}}</ref> Pitfalls in RECIST Data Extraction for Clinical Trials: Beyond the Basics #MMPMID25794800 Abramson RG; McGhee CR; Lakomkin N; Arteaga CL Acad Radiol 2015[Jun]; 22 (6): 779-86 PMID25794800show ga Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is a standardized methodology for determining therapeutic response to anticancer therapy using changes in lesion appearance on imaging studies. Many radiologists are now using RECIST in their routine clinical workflow, as part of consultative arrangements, or within dedicated imaging core laboratories. Although basic RECIST methodology is well described in published articles and online resources, inexperienced readers may encounter difficulties with certain nuances and subtleties of RECIST. This article illustrates a set of pitfalls in RECIST assessment considered to be ?beyond the basics.? These pitfalls were uncovered during a quality improvement review of a recently established cancer imaging core laboratory staffed by radiologists with limited prior RECIST experience. Pitfalls are presented in four categories: (1) baseline selection of lesions, (2) reassessment of target lesions, (3) reassessment of nontarget lesions, and (4) identification of new lesions. Educational and operational strategies for addressing these pitfalls are suggested. Attention to these pitfalls and strategies may improve the overall quality of RECIST assessments performed by radiologists. äPitfalls in RECIST Data Extraction for Clinical Trials: Beyond the Bas(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing