Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3758/s13421-014-0419-9 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3758/s13421-014-0419-9 C4315172!4315172!24858525     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Mem+Cognit 2014 ; 42 (7): 1198-210 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=24858525|t=2014. Memory for flip-flopping: Detection and recollection of political contradictions |pdf=|usr=}}{{24858525}} gab.com Text Memory for flip-flopping: Detection and recollection of political contradictions JO: Mem Cognit http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24858525 #FOAvip During political campaigns, candidates often change their positions on controversial issues. Does changing positions create confusion and impair memory for a politician's current position? In 3 experiments, two political candidates held positions on controversial issues in two debates. Across the debates, their positions were repeated, changed, or held only in the second debate (control). Relative to the control condition, recall of the most recent position on issues was enhanced when change was detected and recollected, whereas recall was impaired when change was not recollected. Furthermore, examining the errors revealed that subjects were more likely to intrude a Debate 1 response than to recall a blend of the two positions, and that recollecting change decreased Debate 1 intrusions. We argue that detecting change produces a recursive representation that embeds the original position in memory along with the more recent position. Recollecting change then enhances memory for the politician's positions and their order of occurrence by accessing the recursive trace. Twit Text FOAVip Memory for flip-flopping: Detection and recollection of political contradictions ????Mem Cognit http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24858525 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24858525 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|24858525}}</ref> Memory for flip-flopping: Detection and recollection of political contradictions #MMPMID24858525 Putnam AL; Wahlheim CN; Jacoby LL Mem Cognit 2014[Oct]; 42 (7): 1198-210 PMID24858525show ga During political campaigns, candidates often change their positions on controversial issues. Does changing positions create confusion and impair memory for a politician's current position? In 3 experiments, two political candidates held positions on controversial issues in two debates. Across the debates, their positions were repeated, changed, or held only in the second debate (control). Relative to the control condition, recall of the most recent position on issues was enhanced when change was detected and recollected, whereas recall was impaired when change was not recollected. Furthermore, examining the errors revealed that subjects were more likely to intrude a Debate 1 response than to recall a blend of the two positions, and that recollecting change decreased Debate 1 intrusions. We argue that detecting change produces a recursive representation that embeds the original position in memory along with the more recent position. Recollecting change then enhances memory for the politician's positions and their order of occurrence by accessing the recursive trace. äMemory for flip-flopping: Detection and recollection of political cont(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing