Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1080/0194262X.2014.950000 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1080/0194262X.2014.950000 C4267300!4267300!25530651     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Sci+Technol+Libr+(New+York,+NY) 2014 ; 33 (4): 351-7 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=25530651|t=2014. Evaluating the NIH Library Editing Service: Pilot Study Used to Analyze Service Impact |pdf=|usr=}}{{25530651}} gab.com Text Evaluating the NIH Library Editing Service: Pilot Study Used to Analyze Service Impact JO: Sci Technol Libr (New York, NY) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25530651 #FOAvip Evidence-based librarianship drives initiatives and priorities in today?s research centers. To evaluate the effectiveness of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Library?s Editing Service, librarians conducted a pilot study comparing edited manuscripts with the published versions. Using a random number generator, five published journal articles were chosen for evaluation from a pool of NIH manuscripts (n=147) edited between January 2008 and February 2012. A rubric delineating categories of frequently-checked writing elements was used to facilitate quantitative analysis. Findings showed that 84% of editors? suggestions were accepted for three of the published papers that were submitted to the originally intended journal. Twit Text FOAVip Evaluating the NIH Library Editing Service: Pilot Study Used to Analyze Service Impact ????Sci Technol Libr (New York, NY) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25530651 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25530651 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|25530651}}</ref> Evaluating the NIH Library Editing Service: Pilot Study Used to Analyze Service Impact #MMPMID25530651 Clark C; Sullivan B Sci Technol Libr (New York, NY) 2014[Dec]; 33 (4): 351-7 PMID25530651show ga Evidence-based librarianship drives initiatives and priorities in today?s research centers. To evaluate the effectiveness of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Library?s Editing Service, librarians conducted a pilot study comparing edited manuscripts with the published versions. Using a random number generator, five published journal articles were chosen for evaluation from a pool of NIH manuscripts (n=147) edited between January 2008 and February 2012. A rubric delineating categories of frequently-checked writing elements was used to facilitate quantitative analysis. Findings showed that 84% of editors? suggestions were accepted for three of the published papers that were submitted to the originally intended journal. äEvaluating the NIH Library Editing Service: Pilot Study Used to Analyz(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing