Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s10393-014-0942-y http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s10393-014-0942-y C4240769!4240769!24845574     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Ecohealth 2014 ; 11 (4): 534-43 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=24845574|t=2014. Beyond bushmeat: Animal contact, injury, and zoonotic disease risk in western Uganda |pdf=|usr=}}{{24845574}} gab.com Text Beyond bushmeat: Animal contact, injury, and zoonotic disease risk in western Uganda JO: Ecohealth http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24845574 #FOAvip Zoonotic pathogens cause an estimated 70% of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases in humans. In sub-Saharan Africa, bushmeat hunting and butchering is considered the primary risk factor for human-wildlife contact and zoonotic disease transmission, particularly for the transmission of simian retroviruses. However, hunting is only one of many activities in sub-Saharan Africa that bring people and wildlife into contact. Here, we examine human-animal interaction in western Uganda, identifying patterns of injuries from animals and contact with nonhuman primates. Additionally, we identify individual-level risk factors associated with contact. Nearly 20% (246/ 1,240) of participants reported either being injured by an animal or having contact with a primate over their lifetimes. The majority (51.7%) of injuries were dog bites that healed with no long term medical consequences. The majority (76.8%) of 125 total primate contacts involved touching a carcass; however, butchering (20%), hunting (10%), and touching a live primate (10%) were also reported. Red colobus (Piliocolobus rufomitratus tephrosceles) accounted for most primate contact events. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that men who live adjacent to forest fragments are at elevated risk of animal contact and specifically primate contact. Our results provide a useful comparison to West and Central Africa where ?bushmeat hunting? is the predominant paradigm for human-wildlife contact and zoonotic disease transmission. Twit Text FOAVip Beyond bushmeat: Animal contact, injury, and zoonotic disease risk in western Uganda ????Ecohealth http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24845574 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24845574 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|24845574}}</ref> Beyond bushmeat: Animal contact, injury, and zoonotic disease risk in western Uganda #MMPMID24845574 Paige SB; Frost SD; Gibson MA; Holland J; Shankar A; Switzer WM; Ting N Ecohealth 2014[Dec]; 11 (4): 534-43 PMID24845574show ga Zoonotic pathogens cause an estimated 70% of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases in humans. In sub-Saharan Africa, bushmeat hunting and butchering is considered the primary risk factor for human-wildlife contact and zoonotic disease transmission, particularly for the transmission of simian retroviruses. However, hunting is only one of many activities in sub-Saharan Africa that bring people and wildlife into contact. Here, we examine human-animal interaction in western Uganda, identifying patterns of injuries from animals and contact with nonhuman primates. Additionally, we identify individual-level risk factors associated with contact. Nearly 20% (246/ 1,240) of participants reported either being injured by an animal or having contact with a primate over their lifetimes. The majority (51.7%) of injuries were dog bites that healed with no long term medical consequences. The majority (76.8%) of 125 total primate contacts involved touching a carcass; however, butchering (20%), hunting (10%), and touching a live primate (10%) were also reported. Red colobus (Piliocolobus rufomitratus tephrosceles) accounted for most primate contact events. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that men who live adjacent to forest fragments are at elevated risk of animal contact and specifically primate contact. Our results provide a useful comparison to West and Central Africa where ?bushmeat hunting? is the predominant paradigm for human-wildlife contact and zoonotic disease transmission. äBeyond bushmeat: Animal contact, injury, and zoonotic disease risk in (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing