Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.012

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.012
suck pdf from google scholar
C4237160!4237160 !24882059
unlimited free pdf from europmc24882059
    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=24882059 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid24882059
      Appl+Ergon 2014 ; 45 (6 ): 1495-503
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • How different types of users develop trust in technology: a qualitative analysis of the antecedents of active and passive user trust in a shared technology #MMPMID24882059
  • Xu J ; Le K ; Deitermann A ; Montague E
  • Appl Ergon 2014[Nov]; 45 (6 ): 1495-503 PMID24882059 show ga
  • The aim of this study was to investigate the antecedents of trust in technology for active users and passive users working with a shared technology. According to the prominence-interpretation theory, to assess the trustworthiness of a technology, a person must first perceive and evaluate elements of the system that includes the technology. An experimental study was conducted with 54 participants who worked in two-person teams in a multi-task environment with a shared technology. Trust in technology was measured using a trust in technology questionnaire and antecedents of trust were elicited using an open-ended question. A list of antecedents of trust in technology was derived using qualitative analysis techniques. The following categories emerged from the antecedent: technology factors, user factors, and task factors. Similarities and differences between active users and passive user responses, in terms of trust in technology were discussed.
  • |*Task Performance and Analysis [MESH]
  • |*Technology [MESH]
  • |*Trust [MESH]
  • |*User-Computer Interface [MESH]
  • |Adult [MESH]
  • |Communication [MESH]
  • |Cooperative Behavior [MESH]
  • |Ergonomics [MESH]
  • |Female [MESH]
  • |Humans [MESH]
  • |Internal-External Control [MESH]
  • |Interpersonal Relations [MESH]
  • |Male [MESH]
  • |Qualitative Research [MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box