Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.03.005 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.03.005 C4214254!4214254 !25085346     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 225.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 225.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 225.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 225.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 225.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 225.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 225.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 259.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 259.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 259.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\25085346 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       J+Stroke+Cerebrovasc+Dis 2014 ; 23 (8 ): 2036-2040 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=25085346 |t=2014. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for identification and quantification of intraventricular hemorrhage |pdf=|usr=}}{{25085346 }} gab.com Text Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for identification and quantification of intraventricular hemorrhage JO: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25085346 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) may be difficult to detect especially when in small amounts and may affect outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs computed tomography (CT) for the identification and quantification of IVH. METHODS: Patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage were enrolled into a prospective registry between December 2006 and June 2013. Diagnostic and surveillance neuroimaging studies were analyzed for the presence of IVH and quantified by Graeb score. In subjects who developed IVH and underwent both MRI and CT, each MRI was paired with the CT scan done at the closest time point, and Graeb scores were compared with the Wilcoxon signed rank test for related samples. RESULTS: There were 289 subjects in the cohort with IVH found in 171. Sixty-eight pairs of MRI and CT were available for comparison. CT failed to detect IVH in 3% of cases, whereas MRI was 100% sensitive. MRI and CT yielded equal Graeb scores in 72% of the pairs, and MRI Graeb score was higher in 24% (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: MRI identifies small volumes of IVH in cases not detected by CT and yields higher estimates of intraventricular blood volume. These data indicate that consideration of technical differences is needed when comparing images from the 2 modalities in the evaluation for IVH. Twit Text FOAVip Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for identification and quantification of intraventricular hemorrhage ????J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25085346 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25085346 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|25085346 }}</ref> Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for identification and quantification of intraventricular hemorrhage #MMPMID25085346 Romanova AL ; Nemeth AJ ; Berman MD ; Guth JC ; Liotta EM ; Naidech AM ; Maas MB J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014[Sep]; 23 (8 ): 2036-2040 PMID25085346 show ga BACKGROUND: Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) may be difficult to detect especially when in small amounts and may affect outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs computed tomography (CT) for the identification and quantification of IVH. METHODS: Patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage were enrolled into a prospective registry between December 2006 and June 2013. Diagnostic and surveillance neuroimaging studies were analyzed for the presence of IVH and quantified by Graeb score. In subjects who developed IVH and underwent both MRI and CT, each MRI was paired with the CT scan done at the closest time point, and Graeb scores were compared with the Wilcoxon signed rank test for related samples. RESULTS: There were 289 subjects in the cohort with IVH found in 171. Sixty-eight pairs of MRI and CT were available for comparison. CT failed to detect IVH in 3% of cases, whereas MRI was 100% sensitive. MRI and CT yielded equal Graeb scores in 72% of the pairs, and MRI Graeb score was higher in 24% (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: MRI identifies small volumes of IVH in cases not detected by CT and yields higher estimates of intraventricular blood volume. These data indicate that consideration of technical differences is needed when comparing images from the 2 modalities in the evaluation for IVH. |*Magnetic Resonance Imaging [MESH] |*Tomography, X-Ray Computed [MESH] |Aged [MESH] |Cerebral Hemorrhage/*diagnostic imaging/*pathology [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Middle Aged [MESH] |Prospective Studies [MESH]Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for identificati(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing