Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1037/a0037004 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1037/a0037004 C4152424!4152424!24956123     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Psychol+Bull 2014 ; 140 (5): 1281-302 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=24956123|t=2014. A Meta-Analysis and Review of Holistic Face Processing |pdf=|usr=}}{{24956123}} gab.com Text A Meta-Analysis and Review of Holistic Face Processing JO: Psychol Bull http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24956123 #FOAvip The concept of holistic processing is a cornerstone of face recognition research, yet central questions related to holistic processing remain unanswered, and debates have thus far failed to reach a resolution despite accumulating empirical evidence. We argue that a considerable source of confusion in this literature stems from a methodological problem. Specifically, two different measures of holistic processing based on the composite paradigm (complete design and partial design) are used in the literature, but they often lead to qualitatively different results. First, we present a comprehensive review of the work that directly compares the two designs, and which clearly favors the complete design over the partial design. Second, we report a meta-analysis of holistic face processing according to both designs, and use this as further evidence for one design over the other. The meta-analysis effect size of holistic processing in the complete design is nearly three times that of the partial design. Effect sizes were not correlated between measures, consistent with the suggestion that they do not measure the same thing. Our meta-analysis also examines the correlation between conditions in the complete design of the composite task, and suggests that in an individual differences context, little is gained by including a misaligned baseline. Finally, we offer a comprehensive review of the state of knowledge about holistic processing based on evidence gathered from the measure we favor based on the first sections of our review?the complete design?and outline outstanding research questions in that new context. Twit Text FOAVip A Meta-Analysis and Review of Holistic Face Processing ????Psychol Bull http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24956123 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24956123 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|24956123}}</ref> A Meta-Analysis and Review of Holistic Face Processing #MMPMID24956123 Richler JJ; Gauthier I Psychol Bull 2014[Sep]; 140 (5): 1281-302 PMID24956123show ga The concept of holistic processing is a cornerstone of face recognition research, yet central questions related to holistic processing remain unanswered, and debates have thus far failed to reach a resolution despite accumulating empirical evidence. We argue that a considerable source of confusion in this literature stems from a methodological problem. Specifically, two different measures of holistic processing based on the composite paradigm (complete design and partial design) are used in the literature, but they often lead to qualitatively different results. First, we present a comprehensive review of the work that directly compares the two designs, and which clearly favors the complete design over the partial design. Second, we report a meta-analysis of holistic face processing according to both designs, and use this as further evidence for one design over the other. The meta-analysis effect size of holistic processing in the complete design is nearly three times that of the partial design. Effect sizes were not correlated between measures, consistent with the suggestion that they do not measure the same thing. Our meta-analysis also examines the correlation between conditions in the complete design of the composite task, and suggests that in an individual differences context, little is gained by including a misaligned baseline. Finally, we offer a comprehensive review of the state of knowledge about holistic processing based on evidence gathered from the measure we favor based on the first sections of our review?the complete design?and outline outstanding research questions in that new context. äA Meta-Analysis and Review of Holistic Face Processing (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing