Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1055/s-0034-1373790 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1055/s-0034-1373790 C4078154!4078154!25049445     free     free     free       Semin+Intervent+Radiol 2014 ; 31 (2): 157-66 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=25049445|t=2014. Renal Ablation Update |pdf=|usr=}}{{25049445}} gab.com Text Renal Ablation Update JO: Semin Intervent Radiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25049445 #FOAvip Thermal ablative technologies have evolved considerably in the recent past and are now an important component of current clinical guidelines for the treatment of small renal masses. Both radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation have intermediate-term oncologic control that rivals surgical options, with favorable complication profiles. Studies comparing cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation show no significant difference in oncologic control or complication profile between the two modalities. Early data from small series with microwave ablation have shown similar promising results. Newer technologies including irreversible electroporation and high-intensity?focused ultrasound have theoretical advantages, but will require further research before becoming a routine part of the ablation armamentarium. The purpose of this review article is to discuss the current ablative technologies available, briefly review their mechanisms of action, discuss technical aspects of each, and provide current data supporting their use. Twit Text FOAVip Renal Ablation Update ????Semin Intervent Radiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25049445 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25049445 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|25049445}}</ref> Renal Ablation Update #MMPMID25049445 Khiatani V; Dixon RG Semin Intervent Radiol 2014[Jun]; 31 (2): 157-66 PMID25049445show ga Thermal ablative technologies have evolved considerably in the recent past and are now an important component of current clinical guidelines for the treatment of small renal masses. Both radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation have intermediate-term oncologic control that rivals surgical options, with favorable complication profiles. Studies comparing cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation show no significant difference in oncologic control or complication profile between the two modalities. Early data from small series with microwave ablation have shown similar promising results. Newer technologies including irreversible electroporation and high-intensity?focused ultrasound have theoretical advantages, but will require further research before becoming a routine part of the ablation armamentarium. The purpose of this review article is to discuss the current ablative technologies available, briefly review their mechanisms of action, discuss technical aspects of each, and provide current data supporting their use. äRenal Ablation Update (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing