Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1155/2014/949785 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1155/2014/949785 C4058177!4058177!24971363     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=24971363&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Biomed+Res+Int 2014 ; 2014 (ä): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=24971363|t=2014. Percutaneous Extraction of Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker/Defibrillator Leads |pdf=|usr=}}{{24971363}} gab.com Text Percutaneous Extraction of Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker/Defibrillator Leads JO: Biomed Res Int http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24971363 #FOAvip Background. Widespread use of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices has inevitably increased the need for lead revision/replacement. We report our experience in percutaneous extraction of transvenous permanent pacemaker/defibrillator leads. Methods. Thirty-six patients admitted to our centre from September 2005 through October 2012 for percutaneous lead extraction were included. Lead removal was attempted using Spectranetics traction-type system (Spectranetics Corp., Colorado, CO, USA) and VascoExtor countertraction-type system (Vascomed GmbH, Weil am Rhein, Germany). Results. Lead extraction was attempted in 59 leads from 36 patients (27 men), mean ± SD age 61 ± 5 years, with permanent pacemaker (n = 25), defibrillator (n = 8), or cardiac resynchronisation therapy (n = 3) with a mean ± SD implant duration of 50 ± 23 months. The indications for lead removal included pocket infection (n = 23), endocarditis (n = 2), and ventricular (n = 10) and atrial lead dysfunction (n = 1). Traction device was used for 33 leads and countertraction device for 26 leads. Mean ± SD fluoroscopy time was 4 ± 2 minutes/lead for leads implanted <48 months (n = 38) and 7 ± 3 minutes/lead for leads implanted >48 months (n = 21), P = 0.03. Complete procedural success rate was 91.7% and clinical procedural success rate was 100%, while lead procedural success rate was 95%. Conclusions. In conclusion, percutaneous extraction of transvenous permanent pacemaker/defibrillator leads using dedicated removal tools is both feasible and safe. Twit Text FOAVip Percutaneous Extraction of Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker/Defibrillator Leads ????Biomed Res Int http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24971363 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24971363 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|24971363}}</ref> Percutaneous Extraction of Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker/Defibrillator Leads #MMPMID24971363 Paraskevaidis S; Konstantinou D; Vassilikos V; Theofilogiannakos E; Mantziari L; Megarisiotou A; Galitsianos I; Karvounis C Biomed Res Int 2014[]; 2014 (ä): ä PMID24971363show ga Background. Widespread use of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices has inevitably increased the need for lead revision/replacement. We report our experience in percutaneous extraction of transvenous permanent pacemaker/defibrillator leads. Methods. Thirty-six patients admitted to our centre from September 2005 through October 2012 for percutaneous lead extraction were included. Lead removal was attempted using Spectranetics traction-type system (Spectranetics Corp., Colorado, CO, USA) and VascoExtor countertraction-type system (Vascomed GmbH, Weil am Rhein, Germany). Results. Lead extraction was attempted in 59 leads from 36 patients (27 men), mean ± SD age 61 ± 5 years, with permanent pacemaker (n = 25), defibrillator (n = 8), or cardiac resynchronisation therapy (n = 3) with a mean ± SD implant duration of 50 ± 23 months. The indications for lead removal included pocket infection (n = 23), endocarditis (n = 2), and ventricular (n = 10) and atrial lead dysfunction (n = 1). Traction device was used for 33 leads and countertraction device for 26 leads. Mean ± SD fluoroscopy time was 4 ± 2 minutes/lead for leads implanted <48 months (n = 38) and 7 ± 3 minutes/lead for leads implanted >48 months (n = 21), P = 0.03. Complete procedural success rate was 91.7% and clinical procedural success rate was 100%, while lead procedural success rate was 95%. Conclusions. In conclusion, percutaneous extraction of transvenous permanent pacemaker/defibrillator leads using dedicated removal tools is both feasible and safe. äPercutaneous Extraction of Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker/Defibrillat(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing