Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2047 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2047 C11287709!11287709!39087105     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       World+J+Gastrointest+Surg 2024 ; 16 (7): 2047-53 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=39087105|t=2024. Retrospective analysis based on a clinical grading system for patients with hepatic hemangioma: A single center experience |pdf=|usr=}}{{39087105}} gab.com Text Retrospective analysis based on a clinical grading system for patients with hepatic hemangioma: A single center experience JO: World J Gastrointest Surg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=39087105 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: The optimal approach for managing hepatic hemangioma is controversial. AIM: To evaluate a clinical grading system for management of hepatic hemangioma based on our 17-year of single institution experience. METHODS: A clinical grading system was retrospectively applied to 1171 patients with hepatic hemangioma from January 2002 to December 2018. Patients were classified into four groups based on the clinical grading system and treatment: (1) Observation group with score < 4 (Obs score < 4); (2) Surgical group with score < 4 (Sur score < 4); (3) Observation group with score ? 4 (Obs score ? 4); and (4) Surgical group with score ? 4 (Sur score ? 4). The clinico-pathological index and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: There were significantly fewer symptomatic patients in surgical groups (Sur score ? 4 vs Obs score ? 4, P < 0.001; Sur score < 4 vs Obs score < 4, ?² = 8.60, P = 0.004; Sur score ? 4 vs Obs score < 4, P < 0.001). The patients in Sur score ? 4 had a lower rate of in need for intervention and total patients with adverse event than in Obs score ? 4 (P < 0.001; P < 0.001). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in need for intervention and total patients with adverse event between the Sur score < 4 and Obs score < 4 (P > 0.05; ?² = 1.68, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This clinical grading system appeared as a practical tool for hepatic hemangioma. Surgery can be suggested for patients with a score ? 4. For those with < 4, follow-up should be proposed. Twit Text FOAVip Retrospective analysis based on a clinical grading system for patients with hepatic hemangioma: A single center experience ????World J Gastrointest Surg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=39087105 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=39087105 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|39087105}}</ref> Retrospective analysis based on a clinical grading system for patients with hepatic hemangioma: A single center experience #MMPMID39087105 Zhou CM; Cao J; Chen SK; Tuxun T; Apaer S; Wu J; Zhao JM; Wen H World J Gastrointest Surg 2024[Jul]; 16 (7): 2047-53 PMID39087105show ga BACKGROUND: The optimal approach for managing hepatic hemangioma is controversial. AIM: To evaluate a clinical grading system for management of hepatic hemangioma based on our 17-year of single institution experience. METHODS: A clinical grading system was retrospectively applied to 1171 patients with hepatic hemangioma from January 2002 to December 2018. Patients were classified into four groups based on the clinical grading system and treatment: (1) Observation group with score < 4 (Obs score < 4); (2) Surgical group with score < 4 (Sur score < 4); (3) Observation group with score ? 4 (Obs score ? 4); and (4) Surgical group with score ? 4 (Sur score ? 4). The clinico-pathological index and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: There were significantly fewer symptomatic patients in surgical groups (Sur score ? 4 vs Obs score ? 4, P < 0.001; Sur score < 4 vs Obs score < 4, ?² = 8.60, P = 0.004; Sur score ? 4 vs Obs score < 4, P < 0.001). The patients in Sur score ? 4 had a lower rate of in need for intervention and total patients with adverse event than in Obs score ? 4 (P < 0.001; P < 0.001). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in need for intervention and total patients with adverse event between the Sur score < 4 and Obs score < 4 (P > 0.05; ?² = 1.68, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This clinical grading system appeared as a practical tool for hepatic hemangioma. Surgery can be suggested for patients with a score ? 4. For those with < 4, follow-up should be proposed. äRetrospective analysis based on a clinical grading system for patients(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing