Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/ 6397949!ä!6397949 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 243.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 243.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 243.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 243.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 243.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Acta+Chir+Scand 1984 ; 150 (8): 689-92 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=6397949|t=1984. Incision and drainage v incision, curettage and suture under antibiotic cover in anorectal abscess A randomized study with 3-year follow-up |pdf=|usr=}}{{6397949}} gab.com Text Incision and drainage v incision, curettage and suture under antibiotic cover in anorectal abscess A randomized study with 3-year follow-up JO: Acta Chir Scand http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=6397949 #FOAvip Conventional incision and drainage was compared with incision plus curettage and primary suture of abscess cavity under antibiotic cover in a prospective, randomized trial of 83 patients with acute anorectal abscess with or without low fistula. All the patients were followed up for three years. The time to healing was on average three weeks less after suture than after incision alone. The difference was statistically significant. Primary healing was obtained in 32 of 42 cases after suture. Recurrence of abscess tended to be more frequent after suture, but the time to healing of initial and recurrent abscesses and fistulas in the three-year observation period continued to be three weeks less after suture than after incision alone, making suture the most attractive treatment. Twit Text FOAVip Incision and drainage v incision, curettage and suture under antibiotic cover in anorectal abscess A randomized study with 3-year follow-up ????Acta Chir Scand http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=6397949 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=6397949 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|6397949}}</ref> Incision and drainage v incision, curettage and suture under antibiotic cover in anorectal abscess A randomized study with 3-year follow-up #MMPMID6397949 Kronborg O; Olsen H Acta Chir Scand 1984[]; 150 (8): 689-92 PMID6397949show ga Conventional incision and drainage was compared with incision plus curettage and primary suture of abscess cavity under antibiotic cover in a prospective, randomized trial of 83 patients with acute anorectal abscess with or without low fistula. All the patients were followed up for three years. The time to healing was on average three weeks less after suture than after incision alone. The difference was statistically significant. Primary healing was obtained in 32 of 42 cases after suture. Recurrence of abscess tended to be more frequent after suture, but the time to healing of initial and recurrent abscesses and fistulas in the three-year observation period continued to be three weeks less after suture than after incision alone, making suture the most attractive treatment. |*Sutures[MESH] |Abscess/*surgery[MESH] |Adolescent[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Anus Diseases/*surgery[MESH] |Clindamycin/*therapeutic use[MESH] |Clinical Trials as Topic[MESH] |Curettage/*methods[MESH] |Drainage/*methods[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Follow-Up Studies[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Random Allocation[MESH] |Rectal Diseases/*surgery[MESH] |Rectal Fistula/surgery[MESH] |Recurrence[MESH]Incision and drainage v incision, curettage and suture under antibiot(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing