Potential role of the comprehensive tooth extraction procedure in preventing medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ): a prospective cohort study #MMPMID41366443
Wang Y; Zhang Y; Li D; Zhang W; Wang S; Zheng X; Li Y; Deng T; Zong C; Tian L; Liu P; Xue Y
Orphanet J Rare Dis 2025[Dec]; 20 (1): 619 PMID41366443show ga
BACKGROUND: This article aims to elucidate the potential role of a comprehensive tooth extraction procedure in preventing mdication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) through a prospective cohort study. By systematically assessing clinical outcomes following this procedure, the study seeks to provide evidence regarding its effectiveness in MRONJ prevention, thereby contributing to improved clinical guidelines and patient care related to dental extractions in at-risk populations. METHODS: Patients using anti-resorptive agents (ARAs) who required extraction of at least one tooth were included in the study. Patients' medical history, medication history, and intraoral dental conditions were documented, and CBCT scans were performed. Following a standardized treatment protocol, patients received professional oral cleaning and antibiotics preoperatively. During surgery, minimally invasive extraction and concentrated growth factor (CGF) filling were performed with meticulous suturing whenever possible. Postoperatively, mouthwash was used within one month. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 10, 30, and 90 days to monitor and analyze MRONJ incidence and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were included in the study, with 20 receiving oral ARAs for osteoporosis, 57 receiving intravenous ARAs for osteoporosis, 13 undergoing combination therapy for osteoporosis, and 11 using ARAs for malignancy. Zoledronic acid and denosumab were the most commonly used drugs. Increased bone density was observed on preoperative CBCT in 26 patients, and on postoperative CBCT at 90 days in 31 patients. In total, 248 teeth were extracted, mostly due to severe defects; periapical periodontitis and periodontitis were also major reasons for extraction. Most patients could not achieve complete and tight suturing. All patients remained free of MRONJ during the 90?day postoperative period, with complete mucosal healing in every case. CONCLUSION: This prospective cohort study provides evidence that implementing an effective and rational treatment protocol during tooth extractions significantly benefits high-risk MRONJ patients. Adherence to such protocols minimizes the risk of postoperative infection, fosters improved healing of extraction sites, and maximizes the prevention of MRONJ. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
|*Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/prevention & control[MESH]
|*Tooth Extraction/methods[MESH]
|Aged[MESH]
|Aged, 80 and over[MESH]
|Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects/therapeutic use[MESH]