Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.7326/ANNALS-25-03415

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.7326/ANNALS-25-03415
suck pdf from google scholar
41359967!?!41359967

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid41359967      Ann+Intern+Med 2025 ; ? (?): ?
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • The Legal and Ethical Framework for Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A World Endoscopy Organization International Consensus Statement #MMPMID41359967
  • Ahmad OF; Mori Y; Bretthauer M; Dourado DA; Hassan C; Bisschops R; Bhandari P; Byrne MF; Dekker E; Mahadevan U; May FP; Messmann H; Misawa M; Ogata H; Saito Y; Silverman AL; Wang P; Yano T; Aabakken L; Berzin TM
  • Ann Intern Med 2025[Dec]; ? (?): ? PMID41359967show ga
  • The OperA (Optimising Colorectal Cancer Prevention through Personalized Treatment with Artificial Intelligence) project aims to transform colorectal cancer care through artificial intelligence (AI) innovations. Recognizing that legal and ethical challenges remain key obstacles to clinical integration, this Delphi study sought to identify and prioritize such concerns in the context of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. Fourteen international experts participated in a 2-round Delphi process. In round 1, the steering committee, with feedback from participants, proposed legal and ethical issues pertaining to AI in endoscopy. Round 2 involved iterative rating and refinement of these issues to achieve consensus on their importance. Consensus was reached on 10 key statements spanning 3 thematic domains: data governance, medicolegal implications, and equity and bias. Experts emphasized the need for robust data protection, transparent algorithmic development, and institutional clarity on data ownership. Liability concerns related to AI-assisted diagnosis and automated reporting were highlighted, alongside calls for guidance from legal and professional bodies. Finally, participants underscored the importance of demographic diversity in training data sets and transparent reporting practices to mitigate bias and ensure equitable AI deployment. As AI tools become increasingly integrated into the clinical practice of gastroenterology, addressing legal, ethical, and equity-related challenges is essential. This expert consensus provides a foundation for developing guidelines and regulatory frameworks to support responsible AI adoption in GI endoscopy.
  • ?


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box