Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1002/pros.70106

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/pros.70106
suck pdf from google scholar
41353629!?!41353629

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid41353629      Prostate 2025 ; ? (?): ?
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • The Pubovesical Complex-Sparing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Improves Early Urinary Continence Without Compromising Oncologic Safety: A Prospective, Randomized, and Double-Blinded Clinical Trial #MMPMID41353629
  • Reboucas RB; da Costa Souto M; Luiza Jacome Franca Campos A; Monteiro RC; de Assis Lira Neto A; Britto CA; Candido P; Romao P; Antunes AA; Nahas WC; Reis ST; Passerotti CC
  • Prostate 2025[Dec]; ? (?): ? PMID41353629show ga
  • BACKGROUND: Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence significantly impacts quality of life. Techniques that preserve periprostatic structures have shown promise in promoting earlier continence recovery, particularly with robotic-assisted surgery. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of pubovesical complex (PVC) preservation on urinary continence recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). METHODS: In this randomized, blinded, prospective clinical trial, 72 patients with localized prostate cancer were assigned to standard LRP or LRP with PVC preservation. The primary endpoint was urinary continence recovery, defined as complete absence of leakage or pad use, assessed at 24 h, 15 days, 1, 3, and 6 months post-catheter removal. Secondary endpoints included operative time, blood loss, complications, and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: At 6 months, continence was significantly higher in the PVC group (82.4% vs. 57.6%; p = 0.027). Earlier timepoints showed improved, though not statistically significant, continence rates in the PVC group. Operative time (109 vs. 75 min; p < 0.001) and blood loss (365 vs. 247 ml; p = 0.010) were greater with PVC preservation. Complication and margin positivity rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: PVC preservation during LRP significantly improves urinary continence recovery without compromising oncologic safety. This accessible technique can be adopted in centers lacking robotic platforms, offering equitable benefits for patients in resource-limited settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC), RBR-7f25wsz.
  • ?


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box