Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1177/10497323251389800

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1177/10497323251389800
suck pdf from google scholar
41351219!?!41351219

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=41351219&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid41351219      Qual+Health+Res 2025 ; ? (?): 10497323251389800
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Research: Insights From Experts via Reflexive Thematic Analysis #MMPMID41351219
  • Dellafiore F; Saba A; Collaro C; Artioli G
  • Qual Health Res 2025[Dec]; ? (?): 10497323251389800 PMID41351219show ga
  • The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping research methodologies across disciplines. However, its integration in qualitative research remains controversial due to epistemological, ethical, and human-centered concerns. This study explores the perspectives of 14 expert qualitative researchers from socio-anthropological and healthcare fields working in Italian academic and hospital settings, with a focus on the opportunities, challenges, and future directions of AI use in qualitative inquiry. Through semi-structured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis, four main themes were developed. First, participants expressed ambivalent attitudes-balancing curiosity with technophobia and emphasizing the need for human oversight and contextual interpretation. Second, an anthropological and philosophical dimension was constructed, underscoring the importance of reflexivity, creativity, and researcher identity as essential counterbalances to AI's mechanistic tendencies. Third, researchers acknowledged AI's practical benefits in tasks such as transcription and data management, and they remained skeptical of its ability to perform complex interpretative work. Finally, ethical and sustainability concerns were raised, including algorithmic bias, data privacy, and the environmental impact of AI technologies. The findings reveal persistent epistemological tensions but also highlight emerging opportunities for AI to enhance research efficiency and accessibility, provided that human interpretative agency remains central. Participants stressed the importance of developing robust ethical frameworks, fostering critical reflexivity, and adopting innovative conceptual approaches to responsibly integrate AI into qualitative research and education. This study offers valuable insights for scholars and practitioners navigating the evolving landscape of AI in qualitative inquiry, advocating a balanced approach that leverages AI's potential while safeguarding the human core of qualitative research.
  • ?


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box