Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.2196/84854

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.2196/84854
suck pdf from google scholar
41343839!?!41343839

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=41343839&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid41343839      JMIR+Ment+Health 2025 ; 12 (?): e84854
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Services Under Illinois Public Act 104-0054: Legal Boundaries and a Framework for Establishing Safe, Effective AI Tools #MMPMID41343839
  • Szoke D; Pridgen S; Held P
  • JMIR Ment Health 2025[Dec]; 12 (?): e84854 PMID41343839show ga
  • Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in mental health have expanded rapidly, and consumers are already using freely available generative AI models for self-guided mental health support despite limited clinical validation. In August 2025, Illinois enacted Public Act 104-0054, the first state statute in the United States to explicitly define and regulate the use of AI in psychotherapy services, establishing boundaries around administrative support, supplementary support, and therapeutic communication. While the Act clarifies several aspects of AI use in therapy, it also leaves important gray areas, such as whether AI-generated session summaries, psychoeducation, or risk-flagging functions should be considered therapeutic communication. Drawing on the history of empirically supported treatments in psychology, we argue that a framework of evidence, safety, fidelity, and legal compliance could help determine when AI tools should be integrated into clinical care. This approach provides a concrete pathway for balancing patient protection with responsible innovation in the rapidly evolving field of mental health AI tools.
  • |*Artificial Intelligence/legislation & jurisprudence[MESH]
  • |*Mental Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box