Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.3171/CASE25570

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3171/CASE25570
suck pdf from google scholar
41343828!?!41343828

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid41343828      J+Neurosurg+Case+Lessons 2025 ; 10 (21): ?
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Osteogenic biodegradable plates for cranioplasty in 6 patients across different age groups: clinical failure of promising concept? Patient series #MMPMID41343828
  • Ishchenko D; Perekopaiko Y; Boldyrev O; Dudenko D
  • J Neurosurg Case Lessons 2025[Nov]; 10 (21): ? PMID41343828show ga
  • BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of cranial bone defects after craniotomy remains a contemporary neurosurgical challenge, necessitating an ongoing search for optimal synthetic materials that ensure effective healing, minimal postoperative complications, and satisfactory cosmetic outcomes. This issue is particularly critical in pediatric patients, in whom the dynamic nature of skull growth presents additional reconstructive complexities. Biodegradable implants with osteogenic and osteoconductive properties represent a promising solution, aiming to reduce complications commonly associated with rigid materials, such as skull deformation, and to enable gradual replacement of implants with native bone tissue. OBSERVATIONS: In this study, the authors report a series of 6 cranioplasty procedures utilizing CyberBone implants, involving 4 pediatric patients of varying ages and 2 adults. Despite the theoretical advantages of these implants, their clinical experience did not meet expectations in terms of mechanical stability, aesthetic outcomes, or evidence of osteointegration. LESSONS: Complications of varying severity, including implant deformation, resorption without adequate bone substitution, and poor cosmetic results, occurred in all patients. Based on these outcomes, the authors do not recommend CyberBone implants for routine clinical use in cranial reconstructions. Further material refinement and comprehensive safety studies are warranted before considering broader implementation in pediatric and adult populations. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25570.
  • ?


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box