Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1080/15412555.2025.2589129

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1080/15412555.2025.2589129
suck pdf from google scholar
41342714!?!41342714

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid41342714      COPD 2025 ; 22 (1): 2589129
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Health Status Instruments Add Prognostic Value in Predicting COPD Exacerbations: Insights from the TIE Cohort Study #MMPMID41342714
  • Palm A; Ellingsen J; Broms K; Farkhooy A; Hogman M; Lisspers K; Stallberg B; Janson C; Malinovschi A; Hardstedt M
  • COPD 2025[Dec]; 22 (1): 2589129 PMID41342714show ga
  • AIM: Identifying patients at risk for acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs) is crucial to improve outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the ability of three health status instruments to predict AECOPDs in subjects with and without previous AECOPDs. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of COPD patients from primary and outpatient care in three Swedish regions. AECOPDs were retrieved from medical records. The modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea scale (mMRC), the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), and the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) were evaluated. Thresholds for AECOPD prediction were estimated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Predictive values were assessed using crude and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: We included 572 patients (59% women, age 69 +/- 8 years, FEV(1) 57 +/- 18% of predicted) in 2014-2016. All three instruments independently predicted future AECOPDs within three years (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.5-1.8) using thresholds mMRC >/= 2, CAT >/=13, and CCQ >/= 1.6. Patients without prior-year AECOPDs but high scores on all instruments had a similar AECOPD risk as those with prior AECOPDs but scores below threshold (aHR 2.4-2.5). Among patients with >/=1 AECOPD the year before inclusion and at least one of the three health status instruments above threshold, the aHR for future AECOPD during the study period ranged from 4.6 to 5.7. CONCLUSIONS: mMRC, CAT, and CCQ were independently associated with AECOPDs over the following three-year period. The health status instruments provided additional predictive value for future AECOPDS in patients both with and without previous AECOPDs. ABBREVIATIONS: aHR: Adjusted Hazard Ratio; AECOPD: Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; AUC: Area Under Curve; BMI: Body Mass Index; CAT: COPD Assessment Test; CCQ: Clinical COPD Questionnaire; COPD: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; DAG: Directed Acyclic Graphs; FEV1: Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second; FVC: Forced Vital Capacity; GOLD: Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease; HR: Hazard Ratio; IHD: Ischaemic Heart Disease; ICS: Inhaled Corticosteroids; IQR: Interquartile Range; mMRC: Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale; ROC: Receiver Operator Characteristic; SD: Standard Deviation; TIE: Tools for Identifying Exacerbations.
  • |*Health Status[MESH]
  • |*Health Status Indicators[MESH]
  • |*Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology/diagnosis/complications[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |Disease Progression[MESH]
  • |Dyspnea/etiology[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Forced Expiratory Volume[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Predictive Value of Tests[MESH]
  • |Prognosis[MESH]
  • |Proportional Hazards Models[MESH]
  • |Prospective Studies[MESH]
  • |ROC Curve[MESH]
  • |Risk Assessment[MESH]
  • |Severity of Illness Index[MESH]
  • |Surveys and Questionnaires[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box