Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1080/14796694.2025.2595688

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1080/14796694.2025.2595688
suck pdf from google scholar
41319290!?!41319290

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=41319290&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid41319290      Future+Oncol 2025 ; ? (?): 1-13
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • A deep learning radiomics model for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastases in early-stage breast cancer patients #MMPMID41319290
  • Li J; Miao Y; Chen J; Stefanidis A; Zhou M; Wu T; You Z; Su J; Zhang K
  • Future Oncol 2025[Nov]; ? (?): 1-13 PMID41319290show ga
  • AIMS: To develop and validate a deep learning radiomics model to predict non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastases in early-stage breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases. METHODS: This retrospective and prospective study encompassed 1,647 patients. Clinical, pathological information, and axillary ultrasound (AUS) findings, collected. Radiomic features of breast cancer lesions were extracted from the ultrasound images. We developed predictive models based on clinical factors alone (C model), clinical factors coupled with AUS (CA model), and clinical factors integrated with both AUS and radiomic features (CAR model). The predictive performance of each model was evaluated via the area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curve analysis. RESULTS: The AUC values for the C model, CA model and CAR model in the test cohort were 0.812, 0.850, and 0.994, respectively. Notably, the CAR model exhibited significantly superior predictive capability compared to both the C model and CA model. In subgroups analyses, the CAR model also achieved the optimal predictive performance. The DCA curve confirmed that the CAR model possessed significant clinical implications. CONCLUSIONS: The CAR model had the capability to predict NSLN metastases in early-stage breast cancer with 1-2 positive SLN metastases.
  • ?


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box