Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107737

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107737
suck pdf from google scholar
41193195!?!41193195

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=41193195&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid41193195      BMJ+Open 2025 ; 15 (11): e107737
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Do people prefer to take part in a clinical trial from home or come to site? A discrete choice experiment in type 2 diabetes mellitus #MMPMID41193195
  • Kopanz J; Lagerwaard B; Veldwijk J; Mader JK; Tews D; van Sloten TT; Grobbee DE; Zuidgeest MGP
  • BMJ Open 2025[Nov]; 15 (11): e107737 PMID41193195show ga
  • OBJECTIVES: To determine what drives participation in clinical trials with decentralised elements and to estimate trial participation probabilities for trials with different degrees of decentralisation. DESIGN: Patient preference study using a discrete choice experiment. SETTING: Recruitment in primary, secondary, tertiary care and other settings in the Netherlands (NL), Austria (AT) and Germany (DE). PARTICIPANTS: People with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) aged >/=18 years. A total of 787 people (NL n=276, AT n=265, DE n=246) participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preferences for participation in clinical trials with different options for location and type of contact with the study team, activities to perform by participant, use of digital technologies by participant, number of scheduled contacts, trial duration, known safety and efficacy of the drug. RESULTS: How much was known about the safety and efficacy of the drug was the most important element in the decision whether to participate in a clinical trial in all countries. The trial duration, location and type of contact with the study team, and number of scheduled contacts were other important elements. Participation probabilities for hypothetical trial scenarios differed between countries, with the highest rates for a decentralised trial involving video contact (NL: 89%; AT: 99%; DE: 84%). CONCLUSIONS: People with T2DM prefer to take part in clinical trials with decentralised approaches. Information on preferences can help trialists and protocol developers to design and plan future trials that integrate patients' needs and thus reduce barriers to participation.
  • |*Choice Behavior[MESH]
  • |*Clinical Trials as Topic[MESH]
  • |*Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy/drug therapy[MESH]
  • |*Patient Participation[MESH]
  • |*Patient Preference[MESH]
  • |*Patient Selection[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |Austria[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Germany[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box