Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1080/17441692.2025.2523542 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1080/17441692.2025.2523542 40586150!ä!40586150 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\40586150.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Glob+Public+Health 2025 ; 20 (1): 2523542 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=40586150|t=2025. Vertical dominance: Cost-effectiveness, randomisation, and the bias against horizontal interventions in global health |pdf=|usr=}}{{40586150}} gab.com Text Vertical dominance: Cost-effectiveness, randomisation, and the bias against horizontal interventions in global health JO: Glob Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=40586150 #FOAvip Interventions in global health are frequently divided into two categories: vertical, which address one disease, and horizontal, which tackle multiple health problems through the building of health infrastructure. When identifying interventions to fund, global health practitioners place great weight on cost-effectiveness, which is determined through cost-effectiveness analyses. These analyses frequently draw on data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), as they are considered the gold standard for determining causality. I argue that the use of RCT data in cost-effectiveness analyses leads to a bias in favour of vertical interventions and against horizontal interventions. This is because it is significantly easier to randomise vertical interventions compared to horizontal ones, so analyses that draw on RCTs will preferentially report on vertical initiatives. This bias contributes to a trend of underfunding horizontal interventions in global health. I argue that this trend is problematic, as horizontal interventions have the potential to be highly cost-effective. Finally, I argue that global health practitioners should find effective ways of evaluating horizontal interventions to ensure their benefits are captured. Twit Text FOAVip Vertical dominance: Cost-effectiveness, randomisation, and the bias against horizontal interventions in global health ????Glob Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=40586150 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=40586150 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|40586150}}</ref> Vertical dominance: Cost-effectiveness, randomisation, and the bias against horizontal interventions in global health #MMPMID40586150 Stoljar Gold A Glob Public Health 2025[Dec]; 20 (1): 2523542 PMID40586150show ga Interventions in global health are frequently divided into two categories: vertical, which address one disease, and horizontal, which tackle multiple health problems through the building of health infrastructure. When identifying interventions to fund, global health practitioners place great weight on cost-effectiveness, which is determined through cost-effectiveness analyses. These analyses frequently draw on data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), as they are considered the gold standard for determining causality. I argue that the use of RCT data in cost-effectiveness analyses leads to a bias in favour of vertical interventions and against horizontal interventions. This is because it is significantly easier to randomise vertical interventions compared to horizontal ones, so analyses that draw on RCTs will preferentially report on vertical initiatives. This bias contributes to a trend of underfunding horizontal interventions in global health. I argue that this trend is problematic, as horizontal interventions have the potential to be highly cost-effective. Finally, I argue that global health practitioners should find effective ways of evaluating horizontal interventions to ensure their benefits are captured. |*Cost-Benefit Analysis[MESH] |*Global Health/economics[MESH] |*Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic[MESH] |Bias[MESH]Vertical dominance: Cost-effectiveness, randomisation, and the bias ag(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing