Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1073/pnas.2204074119 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1073/pnas.2204074119 35867747!9282275!35867747     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Proc+Natl+Acad+Sci+U+S+A 2022 ; 119 (28): e2204074119 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=35867747|t=2022. Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite |pdf=|usr=}}{{35867747}} gab.com Text Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite JO: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35867747 #FOAvip Massive scientific productivity accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the citation impact of COVID-19 publications relative to all scientific work published in 2020 to 2021 and assessed the impact on scientist citation profiles. Using Scopus data until August 1, 2021, COVID-19 items accounted for 4% of papers published, 20% of citations received to papers published in 2020 to 2021, and >30% of citations received in 36 of the 174 disciplines of science (up to 79.3% in general and internal medicine). Across science, 98 of the 100 most-cited papers published in 2020 to 2021 were related to COVID-19; 110 scientists received >/=10,000 citations for COVID-19 work, but none received >/=10,000 citations for non-COVID-19 work published in 2020 to 2021. For many scientists, citations to their COVID-19 work already accounted for more than half of their total career citation count. Overall, these data show a strong covidization of research citations across science, with major impact on shaping the citation elite. Twit Text FOAVip Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite ????Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35867747 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35867747 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|35867747}}</ref> Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite #MMPMID35867747 Ioannidis JPA; Bendavid E; Salholz-Hillel M; Boyack KW; Baas J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022[Jul]; 119 (28): e2204074119 PMID35867747show ga Massive scientific productivity accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the citation impact of COVID-19 publications relative to all scientific work published in 2020 to 2021 and assessed the impact on scientist citation profiles. Using Scopus data until August 1, 2021, COVID-19 items accounted for 4% of papers published, 20% of citations received to papers published in 2020 to 2021, and >30% of citations received in 36 of the 174 disciplines of science (up to 79.3% in general and internal medicine). Across science, 98 of the 100 most-cited papers published in 2020 to 2021 were related to COVID-19; 110 scientists received >/=10,000 citations for COVID-19 work, but none received >/=10,000 citations for non-COVID-19 work published in 2020 to 2021. For many scientists, citations to their COVID-19 work already accounted for more than half of their total career citation count. Overall, these data show a strong covidization of research citations across science, with major impact on shaping the citation elite. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Pandemics[MESH] |*Periodicals as Topic/trends[MESH]Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing