Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.06.008 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.06.008 35779982!9232262!35779982     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=35779982&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Health+Policy 2022 ; 126 (9): 872-878 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=35779982|t=2022. The political cost of sanctions: Evidence from COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{35779982}} gab.com Text The political cost of sanctions: Evidence from COVID-19 JO: Health Policy http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35779982 #FOAvip We use survey data to study how trust in government and consensus for the pandemic policy response vary with the propensity for altruistic punishment in Italy, the early epicenter of the pandemic. Approval for the management of the crisis decreases with the size of the penalties that individuals would like to see enforced for lockdown violations. People supporting stronger punishment are more likely to consider the government's reaction to the pandemic as insufficient. However, after the establishment of tougher sanctions for risky behaviors, we observe a sudden flip in support for the government. Higher amounts of the desired fines become associated with a higher probability of considering the COVID policy response as too extreme, lower trust in government, and lower confidence in the truthfulness of the officially provided information. These results suggest that lockdowns entail a political cost that helps explain why democracies may adopt epidemiologically suboptimal policies. Twit Text FOAVip The political cost of sanctions: Evidence from COVID-19 ????Health Policy http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35779982 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35779982 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|35779982}}</ref> The political cost of sanctions: Evidence from COVID-19 #MMPMID35779982 Fazio A; Reggiani T; Sabatini F Health Policy 2022[Sep]; 126 (9): 872-878 PMID35779982show ga We use survey data to study how trust in government and consensus for the pandemic policy response vary with the propensity for altruistic punishment in Italy, the early epicenter of the pandemic. Approval for the management of the crisis decreases with the size of the penalties that individuals would like to see enforced for lockdown violations. People supporting stronger punishment are more likely to consider the government's reaction to the pandemic as insufficient. However, after the establishment of tougher sanctions for risky behaviors, we observe a sudden flip in support for the government. Higher amounts of the desired fines become associated with a higher probability of considering the COVID policy response as too extreme, lower trust in government, and lower confidence in the truthfulness of the officially provided information. These results suggest that lockdowns entail a political cost that helps explain why democracies may adopt epidemiologically suboptimal policies. |*COVID-19[MESH] |Communicable Disease Control[MESH] |Government[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH]The political cost of sanctions: Evidence from COVID-19 (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing