Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3389/fmed.2022.847407 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3389/fmed.2022.847407 35755058!9226675!35755058     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Front+Med+(Lausanne) 2022 ; 9 (ä): 847407 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=35755058|t=2022. False-Positive Results of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR in Oropharyngeal Swabs From Vaccinators |pdf=|usr=}}{{35755058}} gab.com Text False-Positive Results of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR in Oropharyngeal Swabs From Vaccinators JO: Front Med (Lausanne) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35755058 #FOAvip Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for diagnosing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, RT-PCR may yield false-positive results, leading to unnecessary countermeasures. Here, we report a "positive" nucleic acid test on a 10-pooled sample during the routine screening that caused many adverse societal effects, and financial and resource losses. However, they were subsequently determined to be a case of vaccine contamination. This case study increases awareness of false-positive RT-PCR results for SARS-CoV-2, especially when participants are vaccinators. Moreover, it could provide relevant suggestions to prevent the recurrence of such incidents. Twit Text FOAVip False-Positive Results of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR in Oropharyngeal Swabs From Vaccinators ????Front Med (Lausanne) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35755058 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35755058 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|35755058}}</ref> False-Positive Results of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR in Oropharyngeal Swabs From Vaccinators #MMPMID35755058 Kong XQ; Wang YJ; Fang ZX; Yang TC; Tong ML Front Med (Lausanne) 2022[]; 9 (ä): 847407 PMID35755058show ga Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for diagnosing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, RT-PCR may yield false-positive results, leading to unnecessary countermeasures. Here, we report a "positive" nucleic acid test on a 10-pooled sample during the routine screening that caused many adverse societal effects, and financial and resource losses. However, they were subsequently determined to be a case of vaccine contamination. This case study increases awareness of false-positive RT-PCR results for SARS-CoV-2, especially when participants are vaccinators. Moreover, it could provide relevant suggestions to prevent the recurrence of such incidents. äFalse-Positive Results of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR in Oropharyngeal Swabs Fro(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing