Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s10730-022-09479-7 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s10730-022-09479-7 35587319!9117988!35587319     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       HEC+Forum 2024 ; 36 (1): 71-89 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=35587319|t=2024. Suppressing Scientific Discourse on Vaccines? Self-perceptions of researchers and practitioners |pdf=|usr=}}{{35587319}} gab.com Text Suppressing Scientific Discourse on Vaccines Self-perceptions of researchers and practitioners JO: HEC Forum http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35587319 #FOAvip The controversy over vaccines has recently intensified in the wake of the global COVID-19 pandemic, with calls from politicians, health professionals, journalists, and citizens to take harsh measures against so-called "anti-vaxxers," while accusing them of spreading "fake news" and as such, of endangering public health. However, the issue of suppression of vaccine dissenters has rarely been studied from the point of view of those who raise concerns about vaccine safety. The purpose of the present study was to examine the subjective perceptions of professionals (physicians, nurses, researchers) involved with vaccines through practice and/or research and who take a critical view on vaccines, about what they perceive as the suppression of dissent in the field of vaccines, their response to it, and its potential implications on science and medicine. Respondents reported being subjected to a variety of censorship and suppression tactics, including the retraction of papers pointing to vaccine safety problems, negative publicity, difficulty in obtaining research funding, calls for dismissal, summonses to official hearings, suspension of medical licenses, and self-censorship. Respondents also reported on what has been termed a "backfire effect" - a counter-reaction that draws more attention to the opponents' position. Suppression of dissent impairs scientific discourse and research practice while creating the false impression of scientific consensus. Twit Text FOAVip Suppressing Scientific Discourse on Vaccines Self-perceptions of researchers and practitioners ????HEC Forum http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35587319 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35587319 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|35587319}}</ref> Suppressing Scientific Discourse on Vaccines? Self-perceptions of researchers and practitioners #MMPMID35587319 Elisha E; Guetzkow J; Shir-Raz Y; Ronel N HEC Forum 2024[Mar]; 36 (1): 71-89 PMID35587319show ga The controversy over vaccines has recently intensified in the wake of the global COVID-19 pandemic, with calls from politicians, health professionals, journalists, and citizens to take harsh measures against so-called "anti-vaxxers," while accusing them of spreading "fake news" and as such, of endangering public health. However, the issue of suppression of vaccine dissenters has rarely been studied from the point of view of those who raise concerns about vaccine safety. The purpose of the present study was to examine the subjective perceptions of professionals (physicians, nurses, researchers) involved with vaccines through practice and/or research and who take a critical view on vaccines, about what they perceive as the suppression of dissent in the field of vaccines, their response to it, and its potential implications on science and medicine. Respondents reported being subjected to a variety of censorship and suppression tactics, including the retraction of papers pointing to vaccine safety problems, negative publicity, difficulty in obtaining research funding, calls for dismissal, summonses to official hearings, suspension of medical licenses, and self-censorship. Respondents also reported on what has been termed a "backfire effect" - a counter-reaction that draws more attention to the opponents' position. Suppression of dissent impairs scientific discourse and research practice while creating the false impression of scientific consensus. |*Physicians[MESH] |*Vaccines/adverse effects[MESH] |Dissent and Disputes[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics/prevention & control[MESH]Suppressing Scientific Discourse on Vaccines? Self-perceptions of rese(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing