Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.03.006 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.03.006 35341949!8942908!35341949     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Clin+Epidemiol 2022 ; 147 (ä): 52-59 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=35341949|t=2022. The currency and completeness of specialized databases of COVID-19 publications |pdf=|usr=}}{{35341949}} gab.com Text The currency and completeness of specialized databases of COVID-19 publications JO: J Clin Epidemiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35341949 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: Several specialized collections of COVID-19 literature have been developed during the global health emergency. These include the WHO COVID-19 Global Literature Database, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, CAMARADES COVID-19 SOLES, Epistemonikos' COVID-19 L-OVE, and LitCovid. Our objective was to evaluate the completeness of these collections and to measure the time from when COVID-19 articles are posted to when they appear in the collections. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We tested each selected collection for the presence of 440 included studies from 25 COVID-19 systematic reviews. We sampled 112 journals and prospectively monitored their websites until a new COVID-19 article appeared. We then monitored for 2 weeks to see when the new articles appeared in each collection. PubMed served as a comparator. RESULTS: Every collection provided at least one record not found in PubMed. Four records (1%) were not in any of the sources studied. Collections contained between 83% and 93% of the primary studies with the WHO database being the most complete. By 2 weeks, between 60% and 78% of tracked articles had appeared. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of the best performing COVID-19 collections by systematic reviews to replace paywalled databases. Twit Text FOAVip The currency and completeness of specialized databases of COVID-19 publications ????J Clin Epidemiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35341949 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=35341949 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|35341949}}</ref> The currency and completeness of specialized databases of COVID-19 publications #MMPMID35341949 Butcher R; Sampson M; Couban RJ; Malin JE; Loree S; Brody S J Clin Epidemiol 2022[Jul]; 147 (ä): 52-59 PMID35341949show ga OBJECTIVE: Several specialized collections of COVID-19 literature have been developed during the global health emergency. These include the WHO COVID-19 Global Literature Database, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, CAMARADES COVID-19 SOLES, Epistemonikos' COVID-19 L-OVE, and LitCovid. Our objective was to evaluate the completeness of these collections and to measure the time from when COVID-19 articles are posted to when they appear in the collections. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We tested each selected collection for the presence of 440 included studies from 25 COVID-19 systematic reviews. We sampled 112 journals and prospectively monitored their websites until a new COVID-19 article appeared. We then monitored for 2 weeks to see when the new articles appeared in each collection. PubMed served as a comparator. RESULTS: Every collection provided at least one record not found in PubMed. Four records (1%) were not in any of the sources studied. Collections contained between 83% and 93% of the primary studies with the WHO database being the most complete. By 2 weeks, between 60% and 78% of tracked articles had appeared. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of the best performing COVID-19 collections by systematic reviews to replace paywalled databases. |*COVID-19/epidemiology[MESH] |Databases, Factual[MESH] |Humans[MESH]The currency and completeness of specialized databases of COVID-19 pub(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing