Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111168 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111168 34999365!8701773!34999365     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Forensic+Sci+Int 2022 ; 331 (ä): 111168 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34999365|t=2022. SmartAmp method can rapidly detect SARS-CoV-2 in dead bodies |pdf=|usr=}}{{34999365}} gab.com Text SmartAmp method can rapidly detect SARS-CoV-2 in dead bodies JO: Forensic Sci Int http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34999365 #FOAvip Rapid and accurate detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in dead bodies is essential to prevent infection among those working with dead bodies. This study focused on the Smart Amplification (SmartAmp) method, which has a short examination time (approximately an hour), is simple to perform, and demonstrates high specificity and sensitivity. This method has already been used for clinical specimens; however, its effectiveness in dead bodies has not been reported. This study examined the SmartAmp method using 11 autopsies or postmortem needle biopsies performed from January to May, 2021 (of these, five cases tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and six cases tested negative). Swab samples were collected from the nasopharynx, oropharynx, or anus and the SmartAmp and qRT-PCR results were compared. For the nasopharynx and oropharynx samples, the same results were obtained for both methods in all cases; however, for the anal swabs, there was one case that was positive according to qRT-PCR but negative according to the SmartAmp method. The SmartAmp method may therefore be less sensitive than qRT-PCR and results may differ in specimens with a low viral load, such as anal swabs. However, in the nasopharynx and oropharynx specimens, which are normally used for testing, the results were the same using each method, suggesting that the SmartAmp method is useful in dead bodies. In the future, the SmartAmp method may be applied not only during autopsies, but also in various situations where dead bodies are handled. Twit Text FOAVip SmartAmp method can rapidly detect SARS-CoV-2 in dead bodies ????Forensic Sci Int http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34999365 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34999365 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34999365}}</ref> SmartAmp method can rapidly detect SARS-CoV-2 in dead bodies #MMPMID34999365 Nagasawa S; Mori A; Hirata Y; Motomura A; Ishii N; Okaba K; Horioka K; Makino Y; Nakajima M; Torimitsu S; Yamaguchi R; Inokuchi G; Chiba F; Hoshioka Y; Saito N; Yoshida M; Yajima D; Akitomi S; Iwase H; Saitoh H Forensic Sci Int 2022[Feb]; 331 (ä): 111168 PMID34999365show ga Rapid and accurate detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in dead bodies is essential to prevent infection among those working with dead bodies. This study focused on the Smart Amplification (SmartAmp) method, which has a short examination time (approximately an hour), is simple to perform, and demonstrates high specificity and sensitivity. This method has already been used for clinical specimens; however, its effectiveness in dead bodies has not been reported. This study examined the SmartAmp method using 11 autopsies or postmortem needle biopsies performed from January to May, 2021 (of these, five cases tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and six cases tested negative). Swab samples were collected from the nasopharynx, oropharynx, or anus and the SmartAmp and qRT-PCR results were compared. For the nasopharynx and oropharynx samples, the same results were obtained for both methods in all cases; however, for the anal swabs, there was one case that was positive according to qRT-PCR but negative according to the SmartAmp method. The SmartAmp method may therefore be less sensitive than qRT-PCR and results may differ in specimens with a low viral load, such as anal swabs. However, in the nasopharynx and oropharynx specimens, which are normally used for testing, the results were the same using each method, suggesting that the SmartAmp method is useful in dead bodies. In the future, the SmartAmp method may be applied not only during autopsies, but also in various situations where dead bodies are handled. |*Cadaver[MESH] |*SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification[MESH] |Anal Canal/virology[MESH] |COVID-19[MESH] |COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Nasopharynx/virology[MESH] |Oropharynx/virology[MESH]SmartAmp method can rapidly detect SARS-CoV-2 in dead bodies (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing