Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1353/ken.2021.0023 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1353/ken.2021.0023 34897120!ä!34897120 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\34897120.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Kennedy+Inst+Ethics+J 2021 ; 31 (4): 447-451 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34897120|t=2021. The Epistemic Duties of Philosophers: An Addendum |pdf=|usr=}}{{34897120}} gab.com Text The Epistemic Duties of Philosophers: An Addendum JO: Kennedy Inst Ethics J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34897120 #FOAvip In "Were Lockdowns Justified? A Return to the Facts and Evidence", we argue that Eric Winsberg, Jason Brennan and Chris Surprenant fail to make their case that initial COVID-19 lockdowns were unjustified, due to the fact their argument rests on erroneous factual claims. As is made clear by a response in this volume, the authors mistakenly take us to have been defending the imposition of lockdowns. Here, we clarify the aims of our original paper, and emphasise the importance of getting the facts right when making philosophical arguments in such a contentious domain. Twit Text FOAVip The Epistemic Duties of Philosophers: An Addendum ????Kennedy Inst Ethics J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34897120 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34897120 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34897120}}</ref> The Epistemic Duties of Philosophers: An Addendum #MMPMID34897120 van Basshuysen P; White L Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2021[]; 31 (4): 447-451 PMID34897120show ga In "Were Lockdowns Justified? A Return to the Facts and Evidence", we argue that Eric Winsberg, Jason Brennan and Chris Surprenant fail to make their case that initial COVID-19 lockdowns were unjustified, due to the fact their argument rests on erroneous factual claims. As is made clear by a response in this volume, the authors mistakenly take us to have been defending the imposition of lockdowns. Here, we clarify the aims of our original paper, and emphasise the importance of getting the facts right when making philosophical arguments in such a contentious domain. |*COVID-19[MESH] |Communicable Disease Control[MESH] |Dissent and Disputes[MESH] |Humans[MESH]The Epistemic Duties of Philosophers: An Addendum (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing