Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1002/cpt.2504

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/cpt.2504
suck pdf from google scholar
34862791!9015466!34862791
unlimited free pdf from europmc34862791    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free
PDF vom PMID34862791  :  Publisher
PDF vom PMID34862791

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid34862791
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Anticoagulant Treatment Regimens in Patients With Covid-19: A Meta-Analysis #MMPMID34862791
  • Jorda A; Siller-Matula JM; Zeitlinger M; Jilma B; Gelbenegger G
  • Clin Pharmacol Ther 2022[Mar]; 111 (3): 614-623 PMID34862791show ga
  • Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a hypercoagulable state. It has been hypothesized that higher-dose anticoagulation, including therapeutic-dose and intermediate-dose anticoagulation, is superior to prophylactic-dose anticoagulation in the treatment of COVID-19. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of higher-dose anticoagulation compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19. Ten randomized controlled open-label trials with a total of 5,753 patients were included. The risk of death and net adverse clinical events (including death, thromboembolic events, and major bleeding) were similar between higher-dose and prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% CI, 0.79-1.16, P = 0.66 and RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.73-1.03, P = 0.11, respectively). Higher-dose anticoagulation, compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation, decreased the risk of thromboembolic events (RR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.47-0.84, P = 0.002) but increased the risk of major bleeding (RR 1.76, 95% CI, 1.19-2.62, P = 0.005). The risk of death showed no statistically significant difference between higher-dose anticoagulation and prophylactic-dose anticoagulation in noncritically ill patients (RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.50-1.52, P = 0.62) and in critically ill patients with COVID-19 (RR 1.04, 95% CI, 0.93-1.17, P = 0.5). The risk of death was similar between therapeutic-dose vs. prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69-1.21, P = 0.54) and between intermediate-dose vs. prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.63-1.61, P = 0.98). In patients with markedly increased d-dimer levels, higher-dose anticoagulation was also not associated with a decreased risk of death as compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.64-1.16, P = 0.34). Without any clear evidence of survival benefit, these findings do not support the routine use of therapeutic-dose or intermediate-dose anticoagulation in critically or noncritically ill patients with COVID-19.
  • |Anticoagulants/*administration & dosage/*adverse effects/*therapeutic use[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*drug therapy/mortality[MESH]
  • |Critical Illness[MESH]
  • |Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis[MESH]
  • |Hemorrhage/chemically induced[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Thromboembolism/drug therapy/prevention & control[MESH]
  • |Treatment Outcome[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    614 3.111 2022