Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jhin.2021.07.014 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.07.014 34673114!8522489!34673114     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Hosp+Infect 2022 ; 119 (ä): 84-117 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34673114|t=2022. Disinfection methods against SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review |pdf=|usr=}}{{34673114}} gab.com Text Disinfection methods against SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review JO: J Hosp Infect http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34673114 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019, has caused millions of deaths worldwide. The virus is transmitted by inhalation of infectious particles suspended in the air, direct deposition on mucous membranes and indirect contact via contaminated surfaces. Disinfection methods that can halt such transmission are important in this pandemic and in future viral infections. AIM: To highlight the efficacy of several disinfection methods against SARS-CoV-2 based on up-to-date evidence found in the literature. METHODS: Two databases were searched to identify studies that assessed disinfection methods used against SARS-CoV-2. In total, 1229 studies were identified and 60 of these were included in this review. Quality assessment was evaluated by the Office of Health Assessment and Translation's risk-of-bias tool. FINDINGS: Twenty-eight studies investigated disinfection methods on environmental surfaces, 16 studies investigated disinfection methods on biological surfaces, four studies investigated disinfection methods for airborne coronavirus, and 16 studies investigated methods used to recondition personal protective equipment (PPE). CONCLUSIONS: Several household and hospital disinfection agents and ultraviolet-C (UV-C) irradiation were effective for inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 on environmental surfaces. Formulations containing povidone-iodine can provide virucidal action on the skin and mucous membranes. In the case of hand hygiene, typical soap bars and alcohols can inactivate SARS-CoV-2. Air filtration systems incorporated with materials that possess catalytic properties, UV-C devices and heating systems can reduce airborne viral particles effectively. The decontamination of PPE can be conducted safely by heat and ozone treatment. Twit Text FOAVip Disinfection methods against SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review ????J Hosp Infect http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34673114 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34673114 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34673114}}</ref> Disinfection methods against SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review #MMPMID34673114 Viana Martins CP; Xavier CSF; Cobrado L J Hosp Infect 2022[Jan]; 119 (ä): 84-117 PMID34673114show ga BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019, has caused millions of deaths worldwide. The virus is transmitted by inhalation of infectious particles suspended in the air, direct deposition on mucous membranes and indirect contact via contaminated surfaces. Disinfection methods that can halt such transmission are important in this pandemic and in future viral infections. AIM: To highlight the efficacy of several disinfection methods against SARS-CoV-2 based on up-to-date evidence found in the literature. METHODS: Two databases were searched to identify studies that assessed disinfection methods used against SARS-CoV-2. In total, 1229 studies were identified and 60 of these were included in this review. Quality assessment was evaluated by the Office of Health Assessment and Translation's risk-of-bias tool. FINDINGS: Twenty-eight studies investigated disinfection methods on environmental surfaces, 16 studies investigated disinfection methods on biological surfaces, four studies investigated disinfection methods for airborne coronavirus, and 16 studies investigated methods used to recondition personal protective equipment (PPE). CONCLUSIONS: Several household and hospital disinfection agents and ultraviolet-C (UV-C) irradiation were effective for inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 on environmental surfaces. Formulations containing povidone-iodine can provide virucidal action on the skin and mucous membranes. In the case of hand hygiene, typical soap bars and alcohols can inactivate SARS-CoV-2. Air filtration systems incorporated with materials that possess catalytic properties, UV-C devices and heating systems can reduce airborne viral particles effectively. The decontamination of PPE can be conducted safely by heat and ozone treatment. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Disinfection[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH]Disinfection methods against SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing