Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3758/s13421-021-01219-5 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3758/s13421-021-01219-5 34453286!8395380!34453286     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Mem+Cognit 2022 ; 50 (2): 425-434 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34453286|t=2022. Analytic thinking predicts accuracy ratings and willingness to share COVID-19 misinformation in Australia |pdf=|usr=}}{{34453286}} gab.com Text Analytic thinking predicts accuracy ratings and willingness to share COVID-19 misinformation in Australia JO: Mem Cognit http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34453286 #FOAvip The classical account of reasoning posits that analytic thinking weakens belief in COVID-19 misinformation. We tested this account in a demographically representative sample of 742 Australians. Participants completed a performance-based measure of analytic thinking (the Cognitive Reflection Test) and were randomized to groups in which they either rated the perceived accuracy of claims about COVID-19 or indicated whether they would be willing to share these claims. Half of these claims were previously debunked misinformation, and half were statements endorsed by public health agencies. We found that participants with higher analytic thinking levels were less likely to rate COVID-19 misinformation as accurate and were less likely to be willing to share COVID-19 misinformation. These results support the classical account of reasoning for the topic of COVID-19 misinformation and extend it to the Australian context. Twit Text FOAVip Analytic thinking predicts accuracy ratings and willingness to share COVID-19 misinformation in Australia ????Mem Cognit http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34453286 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34453286 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34453286}}</ref> Analytic thinking predicts accuracy ratings and willingness to share COVID-19 misinformation in Australia #MMPMID34453286 Nurse MS; Ross RM; Isler O; Van Rooy D Mem Cognit 2022[Feb]; 50 (2): 425-434 PMID34453286show ga The classical account of reasoning posits that analytic thinking weakens belief in COVID-19 misinformation. We tested this account in a demographically representative sample of 742 Australians. Participants completed a performance-based measure of analytic thinking (the Cognitive Reflection Test) and were randomized to groups in which they either rated the perceived accuracy of claims about COVID-19 or indicated whether they would be willing to share these claims. Half of these claims were previously debunked misinformation, and half were statements endorsed by public health agencies. We found that participants with higher analytic thinking levels were less likely to rate COVID-19 misinformation as accurate and were less likely to be willing to share COVID-19 misinformation. These results support the classical account of reasoning for the topic of COVID-19 misinformation and extend it to the Australian context. |*COVID-19[MESH] |Australia[MESH] |Communication[MESH] |Humans[MESH]Analytic thinking predicts accuracy ratings and willingness to share C(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing