Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1308/rcsann.2020.7147 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1308/rcsann.2020.7147 34432532!10335224!34432532     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Ann+R+Coll+Surg+Engl 2021 ; 103 (9): 666-672 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34432532|t=2021. Virtual clinics in foot and ankle surgery: patient and clinician perceptions |pdf=|usr=}}{{34432532}} gab.com Text Virtual clinics in foot and ankle surgery: patient and clinician perceptions JO: Ann R Coll Surg Engl http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34432532 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has led to the popularisation of 'virtual' clinics. In orthopaedics, little is known about the use of virtual clinics within foot and ankle surgery, specifically. METHODS: A cross-sectional observation study of patients and clinicians in response to virtual clinics in foot and ankle surgery. Patients seen in a virtual clinic were contacted by telephone from two weeks after their consultation and asked to complete a 12-point questionnaire. Demographic information was also collected. Clinicians in foot and ankle completed a 10-point questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred patient responses were collected. Patient satisfaction with virtual clinics was positive, with 65% of respondents reporting they were very happy (Likert scale rating 5). More than 90% of patients felt they received enough information, felt involved, felt the virtual clinic was helpful and knew who to contact if there was a problem. However, 79% would still prefer a face-to-face consultation, and 22% would have preferred a video consultation. Clinician responses were more cautious, with 60% stating they were neither happy nor unhappy (Likert scale rating 3). Virtual clinics may be faster for the clinician. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual clinics may be more convenient for patients, with high satisfaction levels reported, but represent significant clinical challenges for foot and ankle surgeons. Elements of virtual clinics may persist post pandemic, particularly in routine follow-up. Virtual clinics are not appropriate for new patient referrals. Twit Text FOAVip Virtual clinics in foot and ankle surgery: patient and clinician perceptions ????Ann R Coll Surg Engl http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34432532 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34432532 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34432532}}</ref> Virtual clinics in foot and ankle surgery: patient and clinician perceptions #MMPMID34432532 Rhind JH; Devany A; Ramhamadany E; Ismael S; Heaver C; Hill S Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2021[Oct]; 103 (9): 666-672 PMID34432532show ga BACKGROUND: The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has led to the popularisation of 'virtual' clinics. In orthopaedics, little is known about the use of virtual clinics within foot and ankle surgery, specifically. METHODS: A cross-sectional observation study of patients and clinicians in response to virtual clinics in foot and ankle surgery. Patients seen in a virtual clinic were contacted by telephone from two weeks after their consultation and asked to complete a 12-point questionnaire. Demographic information was also collected. Clinicians in foot and ankle completed a 10-point questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred patient responses were collected. Patient satisfaction with virtual clinics was positive, with 65% of respondents reporting they were very happy (Likert scale rating 5). More than 90% of patients felt they received enough information, felt involved, felt the virtual clinic was helpful and knew who to contact if there was a problem. However, 79% would still prefer a face-to-face consultation, and 22% would have preferred a video consultation. Clinician responses were more cautious, with 60% stating they were neither happy nor unhappy (Likert scale rating 3). Virtual clinics may be faster for the clinician. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual clinics may be more convenient for patients, with high satisfaction levels reported, but represent significant clinical challenges for foot and ankle surgeons. Elements of virtual clinics may persist post pandemic, particularly in routine follow-up. Virtual clinics are not appropriate for new patient referrals. |*Attitude of Health Personnel[MESH] |*Attitude to Health[MESH] |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Orthopedics[MESH] |*Patient Satisfaction[MESH] |*Telemedicine[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Ankle/*surgery[MESH] |Cross-Sectional Studies[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Foot/*surgery[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH]Virtual clinics in foot and ankle surgery: patient and clinician perce(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing