Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3389/fmolb.2021.682405 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3389/fmolb.2021.682405 34368226!8343015!34368226     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Front+Mol+Biosci 2021 ; 8 (ä): 682405 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34368226|t=2021. Evaluation and Comparison of Serological Methods for COVID-19 Diagnosis |pdf=|usr=}}{{34368226}} gab.com Text Evaluation and Comparison of Serological Methods for COVID-19 Diagnosis JO: Front Mol Biosci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34368226 #FOAvip The worldwide pandemic of COVID-19 has become a global public health crisis. Various clinical diagnosis methods have been developed to distinguish COVID-19-infected patients from healthy people. The nucleic acid test is the golden standard for virus detection as it is suitable for early diagnosis. However, due to the low amount of viral nucleic acid in the respiratory tract, the sensitivity of nucleic acid detection is unsatisfactory. As a result, serological screening began to be widely used with the merits of simple procedures, lower cost, and shorter detection time. Serological tests currently include the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), and chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). This review describes various serological methods, discusses the performance and diagnostic effects of different methods, and points out the problems and the direction of optimization, to improve the efficiency of clinical diagnosis. These increasingly sophisticated and diverse serological diagnostic technologies will help human beings to control the spread of COVID-19. Twit Text FOAVip Evaluation and Comparison of Serological Methods for COVID-19 Diagnosis ????Front Mol Biosci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34368226 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34368226 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34368226}}</ref> Evaluation and Comparison of Serological Methods for COVID-19 Diagnosis #MMPMID34368226 Gong F; Wei HX; Li Q; Liu L; Li B Front Mol Biosci 2021[]; 8 (ä): 682405 PMID34368226show ga The worldwide pandemic of COVID-19 has become a global public health crisis. Various clinical diagnosis methods have been developed to distinguish COVID-19-infected patients from healthy people. The nucleic acid test is the golden standard for virus detection as it is suitable for early diagnosis. However, due to the low amount of viral nucleic acid in the respiratory tract, the sensitivity of nucleic acid detection is unsatisfactory. As a result, serological screening began to be widely used with the merits of simple procedures, lower cost, and shorter detection time. Serological tests currently include the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), and chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). This review describes various serological methods, discusses the performance and diagnostic effects of different methods, and points out the problems and the direction of optimization, to improve the efficiency of clinical diagnosis. These increasingly sophisticated and diverse serological diagnostic technologies will help human beings to control the spread of COVID-19. äEvaluation and Comparison of Serological Methods for COVID-19 Diagnosi(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing