Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.5152/dir.2021.201032 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.5152/dir.2021.201032 34318756!8480953!34318756     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Diagn+Interv+Radiol 2021 ; 27 (5): 615-620 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34318756|t=2021. Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of CO-RADS: evaluation of classification in radiology practice |pdf=|usr=}}{{34318756}} gab.com Text Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of CO-RADS: evaluation of classification in radiology practice JO: Diagn Interv Radiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34318756 #FOAvip PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the use of the COVID-19 reporting and data system (CO-RADS) among radiologists and the diagnostic performance of this system. METHODS: Four radiologists retrospectively evaluated the chest CT examinations of 178 patients. The study included 143 patients with positive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test results and 35 patients whose RT-PCR tests were negative but whose clinical and/or radiological findings were consistent with COVID-19. Fleiss' kappa (kappa) values were calculated, and individual observers' scores were compared. To investigate diagnostic efficiency, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for each interpreter. RESULTS: The interpreters were in full agreement on 574 of 712 (80.6%) evaluations. The common Fleiss' kappa value of all the radiologists combined was 0.712 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.692-0.769). A reliable prediction on the basis of RT-PCR and clinical findings indicated the mean area under the curve (AUC) of Fleiss' kappa value as 0.89 (95% CI 0.708-0.990). General interpreter agreement was found to range from moderate to good. CONCLUSION: The interpreter agreement for CO-RADS categories 1 and 5 was reasonably good. We conclude that this scoring system will make a valuable contribution to efforts in COVID-19 diagnosis. CO-RADS can also be of significant value for the diagnosis and treatment of the disease in cases with false-negative PCR results. Twit Text FOAVip Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of CO-RADS: evaluation of classification in radiology practice ????Diagn Interv Radiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34318756 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34318756 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34318756}}</ref> Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of CO-RADS: evaluation of classification in radiology practice #MMPMID34318756 Dilek O; Kaya O; Akkaya H; Ceylan C; Kiziloglu A; Sahin Eker B; Gulek B Diagn Interv Radiol 2021[Sep]; 27 (5): 615-620 PMID34318756show ga PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the use of the COVID-19 reporting and data system (CO-RADS) among radiologists and the diagnostic performance of this system. METHODS: Four radiologists retrospectively evaluated the chest CT examinations of 178 patients. The study included 143 patients with positive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test results and 35 patients whose RT-PCR tests were negative but whose clinical and/or radiological findings were consistent with COVID-19. Fleiss' kappa (kappa) values were calculated, and individual observers' scores were compared. To investigate diagnostic efficiency, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for each interpreter. RESULTS: The interpreters were in full agreement on 574 of 712 (80.6%) evaluations. The common Fleiss' kappa value of all the radiologists combined was 0.712 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.692-0.769). A reliable prediction on the basis of RT-PCR and clinical findings indicated the mean area under the curve (AUC) of Fleiss' kappa value as 0.89 (95% CI 0.708-0.990). General interpreter agreement was found to range from moderate to good. CONCLUSION: The interpreter agreement for CO-RADS categories 1 and 5 was reasonably good. We conclude that this scoring system will make a valuable contribution to efforts in COVID-19 diagnosis. CO-RADS can also be of significant value for the diagnosis and treatment of the disease in cases with false-negative PCR results. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Radiology[MESH] |COVID-19 Testing[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Observer Variation[MESH] |Retrospective Studies[MESH]Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of CO-RADS: evaluat(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing