Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3389/fcimb.2021.653794 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3389/fcimb.2021.653794 34307187!8293915!34307187     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Front+Cell+Infect+Microbiol 2021 ; 11 (ä): 653794 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34307187|t=2021. Comparing SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Anterior Nasal Vestibular Swabs vs Oropharyngeal Swabs |pdf=|usr=}}{{34307187}} gab.com Text Comparing SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Anterior Nasal Vestibular Swabs vs Oropharyngeal Swabs JO: Front Cell Infect Microbiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34307187 #FOAvip PURPOSE: To investigate the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 testing in specimens collected from the anterior nasal vestibules of COVID-19 patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed on 30 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center from March 14, 2020 to March 21, 2020. Paired specimens were collected from both the anterior nasal vestibule and the oropharynx from all patients. All specimens were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients with confirmed COVID-19, 17 patients (56.7%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 when oropharyngeal specimens were used, while 20 patients (66.7%) tested positive when nasal swab specimens were used. There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity between the two methods. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory swabs collected from the nasal vestibule offer a less invasive alternative to oropharyngeal swabs for specimen collection in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and have adequate sensitivity. Twit Text FOAVip Comparing SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Anterior Nasal Vestibular Swabs vs Oropharyngeal Swabs ????Front Cell Infect Microbiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34307187 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34307187 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34307187}}</ref> Comparing SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Anterior Nasal Vestibular Swabs vs Oropharyngeal Swabs #MMPMID34307187 Li M; Wei R; Yang Y; He T; Shen Y; Qi T; Han T; Song Z; Zhu Z; Ma X; Lin Y; Yuan Y; Zhao K; Lu H; Zhou X Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021[]; 11 (ä): 653794 PMID34307187show ga PURPOSE: To investigate the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 testing in specimens collected from the anterior nasal vestibules of COVID-19 patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed on 30 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center from March 14, 2020 to March 21, 2020. Paired specimens were collected from both the anterior nasal vestibule and the oropharynx from all patients. All specimens were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients with confirmed COVID-19, 17 patients (56.7%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 when oropharyngeal specimens were used, while 20 patients (66.7%) tested positive when nasal swab specimens were used. There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity between the two methods. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory swabs collected from the nasal vestibule offer a less invasive alternative to oropharyngeal swabs for specimen collection in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and have adequate sensitivity. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |COVID-19 Testing[MESH] |China/epidemiology[MESH] |Cross-Sectional Studies[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Nasopharynx[MESH]Comparing SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Anterior Nasal Vestibular Swabs vs Or(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing