Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3390/ijerph18147472 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3390/ijerph18147472 34299930!8308059!34299930     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=34299930&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Int+J+Environ+Res+Public+Health 2021 ; 18 (14): ? Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34299930|t=2021. Effects of Natural Ventilation and Saliva Standard Ejectors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Quantitative Analysis of Aerosol Produced during Dental Procedures |pdf=|usr=}}{{34299930}} gab.com Text Effects of Natural Ventilation and Saliva Standard Ejectors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Quantitative Analysis of Aerosol Produced during Dental Procedures JO: Int J Environ Res Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34299930 #FOAvip The novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has renewed attention to aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs). Dental-care workers are at high risk of contamination by SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of standard saliva ejectors and natural ventilation in reducing particulate matter (PM) concentration during different routine dental procedures in the pandemic period. The DustTrak monitor was used to measure PM1, PM2.5, PM10, and breathable (<4 microns) total dust during 14 procedures performed with and without the presence of natural ventilation in a dental unit. Moreover, measurements were performed near the practitioners or near the standard saliva ejectors during the different procedures. In the latter condition, reduced levels of PM10 were recorded (82.40 +/- 9.65 mug/m(3) vs. 50.52 +/- 0.23 mug/m(3)). Moreover, higher levels of PM (53.95 +/- 2.29 mug/m(3) vs. 27.85 +/- 0.14 mug/m(3)) were produced when the dental unit's windows were open. At the same time, the total level of PM were higher during scaling than during other procedures (data suggest not to adopt natural ventilation-both window and door opened-during dental procedures). It was also demonstrated that the use of standard saliva ejectors can considerably reduce the total released amount of PM10. Twit Text FOAVip Effects of Natural Ventilation and Saliva Standard Ejectors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Quantitative Analysis of Aerosol Produced during Dental Procedures ????Int J Environ Res Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34299930 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34299930 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34299930}}</ref> Effects of Natural Ventilation and Saliva Standard Ejectors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Quantitative Analysis of Aerosol Produced during Dental Procedures #MMPMID34299930 Rexhepi I; Mangifesta R; Santilli M; Guri S; Di Carlo P; D'Addazio G; Caputi S; Sinjari B Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021[Jul]; 18 (14): ? PMID34299930show ga The novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has renewed attention to aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs). Dental-care workers are at high risk of contamination by SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of standard saliva ejectors and natural ventilation in reducing particulate matter (PM) concentration during different routine dental procedures in the pandemic period. The DustTrak monitor was used to measure PM1, PM2.5, PM10, and breathable (<4 microns) total dust during 14 procedures performed with and without the presence of natural ventilation in a dental unit. Moreover, measurements were performed near the practitioners or near the standard saliva ejectors during the different procedures. In the latter condition, reduced levels of PM10 were recorded (82.40 +/- 9.65 mug/m(3) vs. 50.52 +/- 0.23 mug/m(3)). Moreover, higher levels of PM (53.95 +/- 2.29 mug/m(3) vs. 27.85 +/- 0.14 mug/m(3)) were produced when the dental unit's windows were open. At the same time, the total level of PM were higher during scaling than during other procedures (data suggest not to adopt natural ventilation-both window and door opened-during dental procedures). It was also demonstrated that the use of standard saliva ejectors can considerably reduce the total released amount of PM10. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Pandemics[MESH] |Aerosols[MESH] |Dentistry[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Effects of Natural Ventilation and Saliva Standard Ejectors during the(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing