Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s00405-021-06992-2 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s00405-021-06992-2 34297182!8298954!34297182     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=34297182&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Eur+Arch+Otorhinolaryngol 2022 ; 279 (2): 1063-1070 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34297182|t=2022. Status quo after one year of COVID-19 pandemic in otolaryngological hospital-based departments and private practices in Germany |pdf=|usr=}}{{34297182}} gab.com Text Status quo after one year of COVID-19 pandemic in otolaryngological hospital-based departments and private practices in Germany JO: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34297182 #FOAvip PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected healthcare systems worldwide. Data on the impact on otolaryngological clinics and private practices is sparse. This study aimed to present data on healthcare worker (HCW) screening, status of HCW, pre-interventional testing, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and the economic impact of the pandemic. METHODS: Otolaryngological private practices and hospital-based departments were surveyed nationwide using an online questionnaire. Participating facilities were recruited via the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and the German Association for Otolaryngologists in Bavaria. RESULTS: 365 private practices (2776 employees) and 65 hospitals (2333 employees) were included. Significantly more hospitals (68.7%) than practices (40.5%) performed pre-interventional testing in their outpatients (p < 0.00). Most inpatients were tested in practices and hospitals (100.0% and 95.0%; p = 0.08). HCW screening was performed in 73.7% of practices and in 77.3% of hospitals (p = 0.54). Significantly more HCW infections were reported in private practices (4.7%) than in hospital (3.6%; p = 0.03). The private or home environment was the most frequent source of infection among HCW in hospitals (44%) and practices (63%). The use of PPE increased over the course of the pandemic. The number of procedures and the revenue decreased in 2020. CONCLUSION: The rate of pre-interventional testing among outpatients in otolaryngological practices is low and HCW infections were found to be more frequent in practices than in hospitals. In addition, a high rate of infections in otolaryngological HCW seems to stem from the private or home environment. Twit Text FOAVip Status quo after one year of COVID-19 pandemic in otolaryngological hospital-based departments and private practices in Germany ????Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34297182 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34297182 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34297182}}</ref> Status quo after one year of COVID-19 pandemic in otolaryngological hospital-based departments and private practices in Germany #MMPMID34297182 Mayer M; Zellmer S; Zenk J; Arens C; Ebigbo A; Muzalyova A; Thoelken R; Jering M; Kahn M; Breitling LP; Messmann H; Deitmer T; Junge-Hulsing B; Rommele C Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022[Feb]; 279 (2): 1063-1070 PMID34297182show ga PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected healthcare systems worldwide. Data on the impact on otolaryngological clinics and private practices is sparse. This study aimed to present data on healthcare worker (HCW) screening, status of HCW, pre-interventional testing, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and the economic impact of the pandemic. METHODS: Otolaryngological private practices and hospital-based departments were surveyed nationwide using an online questionnaire. Participating facilities were recruited via the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and the German Association for Otolaryngologists in Bavaria. RESULTS: 365 private practices (2776 employees) and 65 hospitals (2333 employees) were included. Significantly more hospitals (68.7%) than practices (40.5%) performed pre-interventional testing in their outpatients (p < 0.00). Most inpatients were tested in practices and hospitals (100.0% and 95.0%; p = 0.08). HCW screening was performed in 73.7% of practices and in 77.3% of hospitals (p = 0.54). Significantly more HCW infections were reported in private practices (4.7%) than in hospital (3.6%; p = 0.03). The private or home environment was the most frequent source of infection among HCW in hospitals (44%) and practices (63%). The use of PPE increased over the course of the pandemic. The number of procedures and the revenue decreased in 2020. CONCLUSION: The rate of pre-interventional testing among outpatients in otolaryngological practices is low and HCW infections were found to be more frequent in practices than in hospitals. In addition, a high rate of infections in otolaryngological HCW seems to stem from the private or home environment. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Otolaryngology[MESH] |*Pandemics[MESH] |*Private Practice[MESH] |Germany/epidemiology[MESH] |Health Personnel[MESH] |Home Environment[MESH] |Hospitals[MESH] |Humans[MESH]Status quo after one year of COVID-19 pandemic in otolaryngological h(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing