Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047347

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047347
suck pdf from google scholar
34281922!8290951!34281922
unlimited free pdf from europmc34281922    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=34281922&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid34281922      BMJ+Open 2021 ; 11 (7): e047347
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Predicting mortality of individual patients with COVID-19: a multicentre Dutch cohort #MMPMID34281922
  • Ottenhoff MC; Ramos LA; Potters W; Janssen MLF; Hubers D; Hu S; Fridgeirsson EA; Pina-Fuentes D; Thomas R; van der Horst ICC; Herff C; Kubben P; Elbers PWG; Marquering HA; Welling M; Simsek S; de Kruif MD; Dormans T; Fleuren LM; Schinkel M; Noordzij PG; van den Bergh JP; Wyers CE; Buis DTB; Wiersinga WJ; van den Hout EHC; Reidinga AC; Rusch D; Sigaloff KCE; Douma RA; de Haan L; Gritters van den Oever NC; Rennenberg RJMW; van Wingen GA; Aries MJH; Beudel M
  • BMJ Open 2021[Jul]; 11 (7): e047347 PMID34281922show ga
  • OBJECTIVE: Develop and validate models that predict mortality of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A multicentre cohort across 10 Dutch hospitals including patients from 27 February to 8 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: SARS-CoV-2 positive patients (age >/=18) admitted to the hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 21-day all-cause mortality evaluated by the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. The predictive value of age was explored by comparison with age-based rules used in practice and by excluding age from the analysis. RESULTS: 2273 patients were included, of whom 516 had died or discharged to palliative care within 21 days after admission. Five feature sets, including premorbid, clinical presentation and laboratory and radiology values, were derived from 80 features. Additionally, an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)-based data-driven feature selection selected the 10 features with the highest F values: age, number of home medications, urea nitrogen, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin, oxygen saturation (%), oxygen saturation is measured on room air, oxygen saturation is measured on oxygen therapy, blood gas pH and history of chronic cardiac disease. A linear logistic regression and non-linear tree-based gradient boosting algorithm fitted the data with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.85) and 0.82 (0.79 to 0.85), respectively, using the 10 selected features. Both models outperformed age-based decision rules used in practice (AUC of 0.69, 0.65 to 0.74 for age >70). Furthermore, performance remained stable when excluding age as predictor (AUC of 0.78, 0.75 to 0.81). CONCLUSION: Both models showed good performance and had better test characteristics than age-based decision rules, using 10 admission features readily available in Dutch hospitals. The models hold promise to aid decision-making during a hospital bed shortage.
  • |*COVID-19[MESH]
  • |Cohort Studies[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Logistic Models[MESH]
  • |Retrospective Studies[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box