Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=34269685&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215
Strategies for the Identification and Prevention of Survey Fraud: Data Analysis of a Web-Based Survey #MMPMID34269685
Pratt-Chapman M; Moses J; Arem H
JMIR Cancer 2021[Jul]; 7 (3): e30730 PMID34269685show ga
BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of COVID-19 on cancer survivors, we fielded a survey promoted via email and social media in winter 2020. Examination of the data showed suspicious patterns that warranted serious review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to review the methods used to identify and prevent fraudulent survey responses. METHODS: As precautions, we included a Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart (CAPTCHA), a hidden question, and instructions for respondents to type a specific word. To identify likely fraudulent data, we defined a priori indicators that warranted elimination or suspicion. If a survey contained two or more suspicious indicators, the survey was eliminated. We examined differences between the retained and eliminated data sets. RESULTS: Of the total responses (N=1977), nearly three-fourths (n=1408) were dropped and one-fourth (n=569) were retained after data quality checking. Comparisons of the two data sets showed statistically significant differences across almost all demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous precautions beyond the inclusion of a CAPTCHA are needed when fielding web-based surveys, particularly if a financial incentive is offered.
free
free
free
JMIR+Cancer 2021 ; 7 (3): e30730
