Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.ijid.2021.07.012 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.07.012 34242768!8260556!34242768     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Int+J+Infect+Dis 2021 ; 110 (ä): 105-110 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34242768|t=2021. SARS-CoV-2: Viral Loads of Exhaled Breath and Oronasopharyngeal Specimens in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{34242768}} gab.com Text SARS-CoV-2: Viral Loads of Exhaled Breath and Oronasopharyngeal Specimens in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 JO: Int J Infect Dis http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34242768 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 seems mainly transmissible via respiratory droplets. We compared the time-dependent SARS-CoV-2 viral load in serial pharyngeal swab with exhaled breath (EB) samples of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODS: In this prospective proof of concept study, we examined hospitalized patients who initially tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Paired oronasopharyngeal swab and EB specimens were taken at different days of hospitalization. EB collection was performed through a simple, noninvasive method using an electret air filter-based device. SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was determined with real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Of 187 serial samples from 15 hospitalized patients, 87/87 oronasopharyngeal swabs and 70/100 EB specimens tested positive. Comparing the number of SARS-CoV-2 copies, the viral load of the oronasopharyngeal swabs was significantly higher (CI 99%, P<<0,001) than for EB samples. The mean viral load per swab was 7.97 x 10(6) (1.65 x 10(2)-1.4 x 10(8)), whereas EB samples showed 2.47 x 10(3) (7.19 x 10(1)-2.94 x 10(4)) copies per 20 times exhaling. Viral loads of paired oronasopharyngeal swab and EB samples showed no correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients merely through pharyngeal swabs might not be accurate. Exhaled breath could represent a more suitable matrix for evaluating infectiousness and might allow screening for superspreader individuals and widespread variants such as Delta. Twit Text FOAVip SARS-CoV-2: Viral Loads of Exhaled Breath and Oronasopharyngeal Specimens in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 ????Int J Infect Dis http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34242768 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34242768 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34242768}}</ref> SARS-CoV-2: Viral Loads of Exhaled Breath and Oronasopharyngeal Specimens in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 #MMPMID34242768 Malik M; Kunze AC; Bahmer T; Herget-Rosenthal S; Kunze T Int J Infect Dis 2021[Sep]; 110 (ä): 105-110 PMID34242768show ga BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 seems mainly transmissible via respiratory droplets. We compared the time-dependent SARS-CoV-2 viral load in serial pharyngeal swab with exhaled breath (EB) samples of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODS: In this prospective proof of concept study, we examined hospitalized patients who initially tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Paired oronasopharyngeal swab and EB specimens were taken at different days of hospitalization. EB collection was performed through a simple, noninvasive method using an electret air filter-based device. SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was determined with real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Of 187 serial samples from 15 hospitalized patients, 87/87 oronasopharyngeal swabs and 70/100 EB specimens tested positive. Comparing the number of SARS-CoV-2 copies, the viral load of the oronasopharyngeal swabs was significantly higher (CI 99%, P<<0,001) than for EB samples. The mean viral load per swab was 7.97 x 10(6) (1.65 x 10(2)-1.4 x 10(8)), whereas EB samples showed 2.47 x 10(3) (7.19 x 10(1)-2.94 x 10(4)) copies per 20 times exhaling. Viral loads of paired oronasopharyngeal swab and EB samples showed no correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients merely through pharyngeal swabs might not be accurate. Exhaled breath could represent a more suitable matrix for evaluating infectiousness and might allow screening for superspreader individuals and widespread variants such as Delta. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Exhalation[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Prospective Studies[MESH] |RNA, Viral[MESH]SARS-CoV-2: Viral Loads of Exhaled Breath and Oronasopharyngeal Specim(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing