Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1121/10.0005132 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1121/10.0005132 34241427!8269758!34241427     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Acoust+Soc+Am 2021 ; 149 (6): 3910 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34241427|t=2021. Comparing acoustic analyses of speech data collected remotely |pdf=|usr=}}{{34241427}} gab.com Text Comparing acoustic analyses of speech data collected remotely JO: J Acoust Soc Am http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34241427 #FOAvip Face-to-face speech data collection has been next to impossible globally as a result of the COVID-19 restrictions. To address this problem, simultaneous recordings of three repetitions of the cardinal vowels were made using a Zoom H6 Handy Recorder with an external microphone (henceforth, H6) and compared with two alternatives accessible to potential participants at home: the Zoom meeting application (henceforth, Zoom) and two lossless mobile phone applications (Awesome Voice Recorder, and Recorder; henceforth, Phone). F0 was tracked accurately by all of the devices; however, for formant analysis (F1, F2, F3), Phone performed better than Zoom, i.e., more similarly to H6, although the data extraction method (VoiceSauce, Praat) also resulted in differences. In addition, Zoom recordings exhibited unexpected drops in intensity. The results suggest that lossless format phone recordings present a viable option for at least some phonetic studies. Twit Text FOAVip Comparing acoustic analyses of speech data collected remotely ????J Acoust Soc Am http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34241427 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34241427 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34241427}}</ref> Comparing acoustic analyses of speech data collected remotely #MMPMID34241427 Zhang C; Jepson K; Lohfink G; Arvaniti A J Acoust Soc Am 2021[Jun]; 149 (6): 3910 PMID34241427show ga Face-to-face speech data collection has been next to impossible globally as a result of the COVID-19 restrictions. To address this problem, simultaneous recordings of three repetitions of the cardinal vowels were made using a Zoom H6 Handy Recorder with an external microphone (henceforth, H6) and compared with two alternatives accessible to potential participants at home: the Zoom meeting application (henceforth, Zoom) and two lossless mobile phone applications (Awesome Voice Recorder, and Recorder; henceforth, Phone). F0 was tracked accurately by all of the devices; however, for formant analysis (F1, F2, F3), Phone performed better than Zoom, i.e., more similarly to H6, although the data extraction method (VoiceSauce, Praat) also resulted in differences. In addition, Zoom recordings exhibited unexpected drops in intensity. The results suggest that lossless format phone recordings present a viable option for at least some phonetic studies. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Speech[MESH] |Acoustics[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Phonetics[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Comparing acoustic analyses of speech data collected remotely (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing